You can make a difference in the Apple Support Community!

When you sign up with your Apple Account, you can provide valuable feedback to other community members by upvoting helpful replies and User Tips.

Looks like no one’s replied in a while. To start the conversation again, simply ask a new question.

Disk Utility defaulted to Logical Volume Group format for new 4TB HDD and won't let me change to GUID. Is that a problem?

I just installed a 4TB HGST HDD in the 4th bay of my mid-2010 mac pro (2.8 GHz Quad-Core Intel). I formatted the drive using Disk Utility's "Erase" tab as Mac OS Extended Journaled and the drive seems to be working fine (set up as Time Machine backup). It is recognizing the full 4TB capacity and the first backup in TM took a long time but all the files are there. However, my understanding is that all drives intended for use solely in my mac should ideally be formatted to GUID. The problem is that Disk Utility formatted the drive to a Logical Volume Group/Logical Partition, so it's not allowing me to change the format type now i.e. when I go to the "Partition" tab in Disk Utility, all of the options are greyed out. Also, the RAID tab does not appear for this drive as it does for the other three 1TB drives installed.


So my ultimate question is this - is it a problem that I can't reformat to GUID? If so, why is it a problem and how do I fix it?


Thanks!

Mac Pro, OS X Mountain Lion (10.8.4)

Posted on Aug 19, 2013 12:23 AM

Reply
76 replies

Dec 7, 2013 9:22 AM in response to Alley_Cat

Can the dead drive be salavaged and reformatted using 10.9 or earlier ML installations or on a Windows system?


• 10.6.0 or 10.6.3 "Full Retail" DVD from its Utilities on DVD, or even older DVD;

• any intervening version from its Recovery_HD (on DVD or thumb drive) through 10.8.3;


• any intervening version on a Hard Drive through 10.8.3;


• also in an External enclosure under the troubled versions {10.8.4, 10.8.5, 10.9.0} (provided the enclosure has large drive support);

• 10.9.0 = Not as an Internal drive;


Windows System not sure, but likley.

N.B.> I hesitate to recommend Windows since So Many Windows users TRASH their Mac OS X Volume using Windows Tools to re-configure a Multi-OS Volume.

Dec 7, 2013 1:17 PM in response to Grant Bennet-Alder

I think you are suggesting no one does this normally, but yes, for both previously unformatted drives I simply clicked on the drive and Partition rather than Erase in Disk Utility. I have no idea what would happen with a previously formatted drive but couldn't see any point erasing a new drive whcih most of mine are when I partition them.


Just wanted to test that I could Partition another new 4TB drive via DiskUtility in 10.8.5.


I don't think I've ever used the Erase option to be honest - I might if I was giving a drive away but once I partition and format a drive I rarely re-partition it or give it away anyway.


Does using Erase perform a low-level format of some kind that would take all day on a large drive?


Tried making a couple of partitions this time just to see it wasn't unique to a single partition option.


Also diskutil cs list still give a 'No CoreStorage logical volume groups found'


AC

Dec 7, 2013 2:09 PM in response to Alley_Cat

I am more like you. Use the Partition tab primarily and only lately ever used Erase.


You have to choose "Secure Erase" to write zero to the entire drive, otherwise it is a quick zero, tests all the blocks though where partition tables will be locked into place and insures a backup volume information block exists and works, so the first and last (400,000? more?) sectors are w/o any write/read error.


Interesting that DU behaves differently as I thought some folks had tried at least to partition 4TB into 2 x 2TB to see if they could get around the issue, but never a success story at a 3TB or larger partition.

Dec 7, 2013 3:34 PM in response to Alley_Cat

Does using Erase perform a low-level format of some kind that would take all day on a large drive?

In the dim distant past, it would indeed re-write the block number headers and all the formatting information. Modern drives often use a mechanical device to discern rotational position, so only the data blocks are re-written when you do the equivalent of "format".


The time required to re-write all the data blocks can easily stretch into hours. That is why skeptical old f@rts like me assume the factory did not take the time to do it properly and insist that "whenever a drive is re-purposed" is an ideal time to re-write everything.


Disk Utility does not erase more than the Directory area when you say Erase with no additonal options selected. To get Disk Utility to do overwrite the entire data area, you have to use Security Erase option, and move it off the default at least one click to get it to write one pass of Zeroes over the entire data area.

Dec 8, 2013 2:45 AM in response to Grant Bennet-Alder

Grant Bennet-Alder wrote:


Does using Erase perform a low-level format of some kind that would take all day on a large drive?

In the dim distant past, it would indeed re-write the block number headers and all the formatting information. Modern drives often use a mechanical device to discern rotational position, so only the data blocks are re-written when you do the equivalent of "format".


The time required to re-write all the data blocks can easily stretch into hours. That is why skeptical old f@rts like me assume the factory did not take the time to do it properly and insist that "whenever a drive is re-purposed" is an ideal time to re-write everything.


Disk Utility does not erase more than the Directory area when you say Erase with no additonal options selected. To get Disk Utility to do overwrite the entire data area, you have to use Security Erase option, and move it off the default at least one click to get it to write one pass of Zeroes over the entire data area.

Thanks for the explanation. On Windows formatting used to take an eternity unless you used a quick format technique, though I always used to use the slower option. SInce moving to Macs in 2006 and with drive sizes increasing significantly I have always assumed teh partition option just did a quick format/partitioning and never really looked for teh full format which I assumed would take many hours or even days to complete on drives over 1TB.


Seems this technique does currently work in 10.8.5 for drivesover 2TB using Partition - I wonder if the supplemental update a few weeks ago added a fix quietly?

Dec 14, 2013 11:59 AM in response to Frank Lowney

Here's the solution that worked for me. I booted into MacOS X 10.7 from an external disk, launched Disk Utility from there and noticed right away that disks that were seen as Logical Volume Groups under 10.9 were seen as GUID volumes under MacOS X 10.7. The names of the disks were correct and everything looked as I would have expected. Even the disk names were back to their originals. They had been changed to the name of one of the partitions when I erased the partition and changed that name under 10.9.

So I used Disk Utility under 7.0 to erase and re-partition one of the disks. These options were not available in Disk Utility under 10.9.


Rebooting into 10.9, I note that Disk Utility there shows this disk and its partition as GUID so that seems to be a way to recover from this situation.


I am currently in the process of carefully shuffling data around so that I can erase a re-partition the other affected volumes.


To speculate, I would guess that Apple changed Disk Utility to accommodate fusion disks and, in doing so, screwed things up. I have logged a report of this at bugreport.apple.com.

Disk Utility defaulted to Logical Volume Group format for new 4TB HDD and won't let me change to GUID. Is that a problem?

Welcome to Apple Support Community
A forum where Apple customers help each other with their products. Get started with your Apple Account.