sjøgren

Q: Mavericks and memory (Ram)

Hi

 

Anyone else noticed how Mavericks uses memory ?

I have a new Macbook Air 2013 with 4GB of memory and after a short wile.

The system have used 3.99GB of the total 4GB Isn't that a big problem. Thats can't be right.

I would think that the computer would suffer greatly after a short time of use and the computer

needs to be restarted. If thats true. The new Mavericks ***** big time on Computers with less

memory. Or is there something i don't know.

 

Thanks

Posted on Oct 23, 2013 8:07 AM

Close

Q: Mavericks and memory (Ram)

  • All replies
  • Helpful answers

Page 1 of 31 last Next
  • by cbs20,

    cbs20 cbs20 Oct 23, 2013 8:11 AM in response to sjøgren
    Level 4 (2,785 points)
    Oct 23, 2013 8:11 AM in response to sjøgren

    Mavericks uses memory smarter than previous OS's, not necessarily less memory. Look at the swap memory if that is high then you have a problem. Also, if the mac is still running fast then there isn't a problem.

  • by Dr. Cox,

    Dr. Cox Dr. Cox Oct 23, 2013 8:19 AM in response to sjøgren
    Level 1 (110 points)
    Oct 23, 2013 8:19 AM in response to sjøgren

    I noticed that Mavericks is utilizing more memory than Mountian Lion did, I purchased a new iMac 27 inch with 8Gb of memory last weekend. When viewing the utilization of memory under Mountain Lion i noticed I had about 4Gb of free memory. Upon installing Mavericks I now show less than 1Gb of memory free. I do have to say I havent notice any preformance issues thus far but it has made me reconsider purchasing additional memory for my iMac.

  • by andyBall_uk,

    andyBall_uk andyBall_uk Oct 23, 2013 8:19 AM in response to sjøgren
    Level 7 (20,495 points)
    Oct 23, 2013 8:19 AM in response to sjøgren

    I agree, that sounds normal for Mavericks - unless 'Swap Used' is significant, there's no problem.

  • by sjøgren,

    sjøgren sjøgren Oct 23, 2013 8:24 AM in response to andyBall_uk
    Level 1 (56 points)
    Oct 23, 2013 8:24 AM in response to andyBall_uk

    Oh, so thats normal with this new system. I must admit that at first i did think. Oh my. This is not good.

    And i'm still not sure but ofcause as more people who knows about this say its alright. I will feel much

    better

    My swap memory says 0. so from what your saying. I'm fine... right

     

    Mavericks memory.jpg

  • by vea1083,Solvedanswer

    vea1083 vea1083 Oct 23, 2013 8:25 AM in response to sjøgren
    Level 3 (696 points)
    Oct 23, 2013 8:25 AM in response to sjøgren

    As cbs20 said, OS X Mavericks uses RAM much more efficiently than any other previous version of OS X. Mavericks now has a memory compression feature that will compress the memory occupied by applications that aren't being actively used and give the freed up RAM to the application that needs it the most. The result is a much more responsive system and less memory being dumped to a swap file to the HDD which is what reduces the performance of your Mac.

     

    If I were you, I would not look at the RAM used number but rather to the Memory Pressure graph that tells you how stressed is the system in terms of memory.

     

    I hope this clears out your question.

     

    Fore more information about OS X Mavericks new system management technologies visit:

     

    http://www.apple.com/osx/whats-new/#advanced-tech

  • by cbs20,

    cbs20 cbs20 Oct 23, 2013 8:26 AM in response to sjøgren
    Level 4 (2,785 points)
    Oct 23, 2013 8:26 AM in response to sjøgren

    Correct, checkout the MacRumors.com Mavericks forum. Developers were discussing this issue and have better explanations than I could provide.

  • by sjøgren,

    sjøgren sjøgren Oct 23, 2013 8:54 AM in response to vea1083
    Level 1 (56 points)
    Oct 23, 2013 8:54 AM in response to vea1083

    Thats cool. Thanks a lot for clearing this. I guess i should´nt be concerned about having 4Gigs installed and Mavericks using 3.99GB almost immediately after restart.. That makes sense at least.

     

    Thx again

  • by andyBall_uk,

    andyBall_uk andyBall_uk Oct 23, 2013 8:57 AM in response to sjøgren
    Level 7 (20,495 points)
    Oct 23, 2013 8:57 AM in response to sjøgren

    >>so from what your saying. I'm fine... right

    Yes, you are.

  • by raul t,

    raul t raul t Oct 25, 2013 9:52 AM in response to cbs20
    Level 1 (0 points)
    Oct 25, 2013 9:52 AM in response to cbs20

    Why is my Mac running slower then.  I see the little wheel spinning more often.  To turn on Activity Monitor or Terminal used to be quick.  Now, Mavericks thinks (RAM's) about it too much.

     

    All this is after two days of Mavericks.  Everything is Indexed.  Everything I start now takes longer.

     

    Would doing a "Clean Install" help?

     

    -rt

  • by rubenmera,

    rubenmera rubenmera Oct 25, 2013 9:49 PM in response to sjøgren
    Level 1 (0 points)
    Oct 25, 2013 9:49 PM in response to sjøgren

    I have years using this mac mini server to run a VMware Fusion session for a Home Office Asterisk PBX, never had a problem with memory until I upgraded to 10.9.

     

    Now I cant last 24hrs with my PBX running without the application hanging and getting a message that reads...

     

    "Your system has run out of application memory." with a Force Quit Applications dialog where VMware Fusion shows in red an labeled as "Paused".

     

    memory.jpg

  • by Tatsushige.Edo,

    Tatsushige.Edo Tatsushige.Edo Oct 26, 2013 12:29 AM in response to sjøgren
    Level 1 (5 points)
    Oct 26, 2013 12:29 AM in response to sjøgren

    If you only have 4GB then you are in the same boat as me, you will need to upgrade to 8GB RAM or aftermaket 12GB or 16GB

     

    I have a MacBook Pro mid 2012, I bought it about 4 months ago, it came with Mt Lion and had no problems, now after installing Maverick it is running slow, tell the turth a snail moves faster.

     

    What I have found out is Maverick is very heavy on RAM, if you have only 4GB like I have then you are going to be waiting a long time for anything to work.

     

    At the moment I have 4GB but only 246.1MB Free for anything to run and the only thing I have open on the MacBook is Safari.

     

    I make movies on iMovie and now it is impossible to do.

     

     

    You will like me have to up grade, if you only upgrade to 8GB RAM, just do not buy though Apple. I was quoted about $US210 here in Japan, yet Buffalo has Apple 8GB for about $US70.

     

    If you decide more then 8GB then you need to seach the web for someone selling them.

  • by Caio Ferrari BR,

    Caio Ferrari BR Caio Ferrari BR Oct 26, 2013 6:49 AM in response to rubenmera
    Level 1 (4 points)
    iPhone
    Oct 26, 2013 6:49 AM in response to rubenmera

    it's really strange that a system released with the promise of compress your memory is eating more memory than it's predecessor.

     

    I think increase your memory would solve that but I hope that memory compressing would get us free of increasing it.

  • by rfoncier,

    rfoncier rfoncier Oct 27, 2013 3:53 AM in response to sjøgren
    Level 1 (0 points)
    Oct 27, 2013 3:53 AM in response to sjøgren

    I have the same problem with my Macbook Pro Core 2 Duo (4Go RAM). With ML, I had no problem. The amount of free memory with 5-6 apps opened was about 1.5-2Go. From now, with Mavericks, it remains only 200-300Mo of free RAM. The OS is very slow with only one or two applications ! Increase my RAM is not a right solution. Where is the free space of memory offered by this new feature of memory's compression ?

  • by Caio Ferrari BR,

    Caio Ferrari BR Caio Ferrari BR Oct 27, 2013 6:11 AM in response to rfoncier
    Level 1 (4 points)
    iPhone
    Oct 27, 2013 6:11 AM in response to rfoncier

    In my case, I'm still stuck in Snow Leopard which I think is the best Apple OS. I really want some new features of MacOS like the airplay but I'm afraid of loose much performance since  I have a old 2008 iMac.

     

    I got so excited about the focus on performance of the new MacOS 10.9 but now I'm disappointed with soo many comments about the memory usage. It's a contradiction since it's a system that caims for memory compression.

     

    Come'on Apple! Tell us something!

Page 1 of 31 last Next