Indeed. What is the point of running UNIX on a top-of-the-line CPU with gobs of RAM and SSD storage if not to do actual work?
I'm a university lecturer in an information studies department. Virtually all of the professors in my department use Macs. They ain't playing Angry Birds on them. This is the platform for doing serious development work, and has been, now, for many years.
Don't get me started on the Mac Pro, either. "It'll work great for the 12 video producers still on the platform after the FCPX fiasco!" Yeah, but it's not going to work great for any of the researchers I know. It's not going to be an easy sell on a grant application. The education industry tends to buy hardware in bulk, and is probably the only industry that buys Apple hardware in bulk. The direction this company is taking is wrong, wrong, wrong.
Contrary to what the quarterly earnings report imply, it's the power users who drive adoption. When people look around and notice that anyone who really does a lot of computer-intensive work is using a Mac, they think, "I should use one too." When people look around and see iPads that cost a lot more than Android tablets, but don't really do any more, they think, "That Nexus looks pretty nice."
The company's entire strategy is going to sink them. What if Ford noticed that people were buying more cupholders than cars these days and concluded that they needed to focus their efforts on cupholders instead of cars? "Cars? Only power users use those. The real money is in cupholders..."
One of these products is much more expensive and much more durable than the other. That doesn't mean it's not important.