Does the new Macbook Pro 15" (late 2013) supports 4K via Thunderbolt/Displayport?

I understand that the new Macbook Pro 15" (late 2013 with Nvidia) supports 4K screen resolutions via HDMI at low hertz. But does it support 4K via Thunderbolt/Displayport? I read on Intel's web that the NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M with 2GB memory in theory can support it. Would be important as a range of new 4K 32" monitors will come out over the next year. Would be great for photo, video editing etc.

MacBook Pro with Retina display, OS X Mavericks (10.9)

Posted on Oct 24, 2013 2:48 AM

Reply
Question marked as Top-ranking reply

Posted on Dec 22, 2013 5:03 AM

I've just found this information http://support.apple.com/kb/HT5918?viewlocale=en_US


Note that these displays default to 30 Hz (instead of 60 Hz) and need to be manually configured to 60 Hz using the display's built-in controls.

  • For the Sharp PN-K321, you can modify this under Settings > DisplayPort STREAM.
  • For the ASUS PQ321Q, you can modify this under OSD menu > Setup > DisplayPort Stream.
312 replies

Feb 2, 2015 9:48 AM in response to n1k1ta

I don't think I'm using scaling in that way. I use SwitchResX and I have run the monitor at 3840x2160 HiDPI and 2560x1440 HiDPI and the performance seems to me to be fairly equal in each.


I do not use bootcamp.


My thoughts on your dilemma with discrete GPU or not is that I wish I had chosen the discrete GPU instead of the model with the "Iris Pro only" graphics. At the time I decided to purchase, I was intending to only drive ONE external monitor at 1920x1200, and had no idea that within a year, I would be driving BOTH a 3840x2160 monitor AND ALSO a 3440x1440 monitor. Had I know, I would have DEFINITELY got the model with the GT 750M. The idea there being "it's better to HAVE discrete GPUs and not need them, than to NEED them without having them!!!"


If I had it to do over, I would definitely gone with the higher video horsepower.

Jun 28, 2015 5:08 AM in response to mg428

I don't have your answer, but you are discussing orthogonal issues. The 10x improvement in graphics is how fast the computer can draw to the screen buffer. The 4K 60Hz issue is how fast the port protocol allows the finished screen to be transferred to the device. The main hope of the 10x is that IF your computer can support a 4K display, then it will also be usable at that resolution - for example, you won't see lagging window drags, window scrolls, etc.


As an example, all our 2010 Macs support 2,560 displays, but the GPUs aren't really up to it. Only in the best circumstances can we, say, watch a video at that resolution, and I often have to drop it down to 1,280 x 800 depending on what I'm doing.

Nov 13, 2015 6:18 AM in response to FaisalZ

@FaisalZ How did you get it to output 4k @ 6Hz?


I have the Dell P2715Q connected from the mDP on my late 2013 rMBP to full DP port on the monitor with cable supplied with the monitor and it only outputs 30Hz to a single screen in Mac OS X El Capitan.


And even with SwitchResX, the best resolution that appears to be supported is 3840 x 2160, 30Hz.


The HiDPI scaling works great, though, but the refresh rate is so horrible, I'm finding myself wanting to use the main laptop screen!


Also worth noting, the second monitor downstream won't display at all, but when I connect a Lenovo laptop running Windows 10 it works fine. The main display is still only running at 30Hz, though, even in Windows.

This thread has been closed by the system or the community team. You may vote for any posts you find helpful, or search the Community for additional answers.

Does the new Macbook Pro 15" (late 2013) supports 4K via Thunderbolt/Displayport?

Welcome to Apple Support Community
A forum where Apple customers help each other with their products. Get started with your Apple Account.