Why is Now Up to Date broken?
I am unable to upgrade to Mavericks, because my business is dependent on Now Up to Date. Finding an adequate substitute maybe be possible after a lot of research; however, I have detailed Now Up to Date patient records that stretch back more than 10 years. This easily searchable database is essential to my continued operation.
This leads to two questions that I've had for years: Why does every new release of the Mac operating system break essential software? And, why does Microsoft not have this problem?
Is Microsoft doing more thorough research on the demands and limitations of old software and is therefore much better able to support legacy software while still continuing to innovate?
Another question comes to mind: Why on earth did Apple abandon Rosetta -- one of it most elegant inventions? As Apple must certainly be aware, many PowerMac programs never made the transition to the Intel world. Loss of these programs has unnecessarily cheapened Apple's brand and reputation as a company that cares about its user base. It has also handed Microsoft an excellent advertising advantage. Although I don't like their operating system, I am sympathetic to their claim that they treat their customer base with respect. When a Microsoft user buys Windows software, he or she can rest easy in the knowledge that in a couple years their investment will continue to function.
MacBook Pro, OS X Mountain Lion (10.8.5)
