Hi there, just to throw my experiences behind this as well. I purchased a new Late 2013 rMBP 15" 2.3/16GB/512 and I noticed when connected to my office wireless lan that the wireless was working but the performance was very slow. I also bought a TB > Gig Lan adapter and I noticed an massive speed difference, I went back to the wifi and I noticed further problems.
Whilst I got an IP address from my DHCP assigned access point, I could ping myself but not my default gateway. I also couldn't ping other network devices, yet anything else on the wifi worked. I tried the wireless at a few client sites and got intermittent results, sometimes it works others it doesn't. Massive dissapointment for £2300 (give or take).
I have done some ping tests and post a few results, these were taken from home wireless N network.
PING 192.168.1.1 (192.168.1.1): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_seq=0 ttl=64 time=2.396 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=3.356 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=24.109 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_seq=3 ttl=64 time=4.176 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_seq=4 ttl=64 time=1.363 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_seq=5 ttl=64 time=2.425 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_seq=6 ttl=64 time=4.655 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_seq=7 ttl=64 time=1.510 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_seq=8 ttl=64 time=2.125 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_seq=9 ttl=64 time=8.170 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_seq=10 ttl=64 time=29.939 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_seq=11 ttl=64 time=25.826 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_seq=12 ttl=64 time=15.987 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_seq=13 ttl=64 time=1.403 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_seq=14 ttl=64 time=27.315 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_seq=15 ttl=64 time=4.203 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_seq=16 ttl=64 time=3.339 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_seq=17 ttl=64 time=5.675 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_seq=18 ttl=64 time=3.965 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_seq=19 ttl=64 time=6.318 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_seq=20 ttl=64 time=1.365 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_seq=21 ttl=64 time=7.239 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_seq=22 ttl=64 time=9.895 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_seq=23 ttl=64 time=16.199 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_seq=24 ttl=64 time=7.898 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_seq=25 ttl=64 time=6.329 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_seq=26 ttl=64 time=1.350 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_seq=27 ttl=64 time=12.248 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_seq=28 ttl=64 time=2.784 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_seq=29 ttl=64 time=10.799 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_seq=30 ttl=64 time=18.839 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_seq=31 ttl=64 time=15.164 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_seq=32 ttl=64 time=6.331 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_seq=33 ttl=64 time=31.285 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_seq=34 ttl=64 time=28.049 ms
Request timeout for icmp_seq 35
64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_seq=36 ttl=64 time=22.079 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_seq=37 ttl=64 time=12.444 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_seq=38 ttl=64 time=1.321 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_seq=39 ttl=64 time=14.383 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_seq=40 ttl=64 time=2.551 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_seq=41 ttl=64 time=7.931 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_seq=42 ttl=64 time=14.202 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_seq=43 ttl=64 time=27.478 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_seq=44 ttl=64 time=2.651 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_seq=45 ttl=64 time=9.677 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_seq=46 ttl=64 time=1.452 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_seq=47 ttl=64 time=5.039 ms
^C
--- 192.168.1.1 ping statistics ---
48 packets transmitted, 47 packets received, 2.1% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 1.321/10.111/31.285/8.975 ms
Colin:~ colin
wow, thats not good. I can also get similar results from pinging different websites. I have tried different dns providers which makes no difference. I've had the laptop 7 days now and consider this a real inconvenience. I hope a fix comes soon. Dissapointed!