bodosom wrote:
While I applaud getting closer to the truth Dan Rayburn takes two steps back for every step forward.
The biggest problem is he behaves as if there's a competitive market so pricing will be reasonable. I'm sure unhappy Comcast customers would like to know who's competing with Comcast for "last mile" broadband.
He is correct that much of coverage is inaccurate in various ways.
I absolutely agree that there is not a competitive maket for broadband here in the US. Susan Crawford nails it '“the United States now has neither a competitive market for high-speed wired internet access nor government oversight.”
However I think his summary is spot on "Bottom line is this is good for Netflix, Comcast and for consumers and it has absolutely nothing to do with Net Neutrality."
The proof I think is that AT&T and Verizon now are saying don't worry we'll get the same deal with Netflix........
Wonder who has the stronger negotiating position now?