Apple Event: May 7th at 7 am PT

Looks like no one’s replied in a while. To start the conversation again, simply ask a new question.

Do I need to get rid of iPhoto for storing/accessing photos on wifi network?

My wife is a food blogger and takes 1000s of pictures a week. Our iPhoto library is close to 400gbs. I just converted her MacBook to an SSD to improve performance and the plan is to just store the most recent month's photos on the MacBook and put the rest on an NAS. We previously tried a USB hard drive to do this and it was much too frustrating for 2 reasons. One, we back up everything via crashplan so it was a pain to always make sure it was plugged into her MB as she would carry it around from the office, living room, kitchen, etc. We also have 3 young boys so portable hard drives plugged into a laptop that is always at arms reach is a recipe for disaster. (Already had one ruined because of that) So we need some sort of wireless option. We understand it may be slower, but we won't access those files very often so it's not a huge deal. Everything I've read about various NASs (Synology, My Cloud, etc.) all say they don't work too well with IPhoto/Apeture. (Currently use iPhoto) So any recommendations on better options? I want something fairly simple for her. What about transitioning to Lightroom or non-Apple to allow easier remote storage and access? Anyone have any success with wireless remote storage/access of iPhoto?


Thanks!

MacBook, Mac OS X (10.6.8)

Posted on Jan 13, 2014 7:49 AM

Reply
Question marked as Best reply

Posted on Jan 13, 2014 8:14 AM

The problem with wireless is not iPhoto nor is is it speed (although speed is an issue) - it is reliability of the wireless signal and the possibility (probabilty) that some glitch will occur wile editing or importing photos nad will corrupt your photos


and the iPhoto library can not be on a NAS


So switching to a different product will allow NAS use for your library of photos - but ti will not avoid the issue of wireless issues


In your case the reliability may not be an issue if you are pretty much only looking at older photos not imporing and editing


LN

16 replies

Jan 14, 2014 3:33 PM in response to brandonb2222

The problem with Crashplan - and other online back up services - is the same as the problem with the NAS: Disk Format. None of these services use Mac OS Extended. If you copy a library there, there is only a small risk of damage, but once you update the Library with an incremental back up - which involves writing the the Library - the risk of damage and dataloss grows to the point of inevitablity.

Do I need to get rid of iPhoto for storing/accessing photos on wifi network?

Welcome to Apple Support Community
A forum where Apple customers help each other with their products. Get started with your Apple ID.