If no one else is going to say it I find it a real shame that Frank (Mad Frank) had his comprehensive fix deleted from this thread... and I may suffer the same fate which would be an indictment itself in practise.
From my many years work as a designer and advertising professional I hardly believe that Frank's posted fix for the many many Apple/Mac users still wanting to use OS10.5.8 (Safari 5.0.6) and OS10.6.8 (Safari 5.1.10) with the search engine in question be it by choice or financial reasons constitutes a breach of advertising due to a link as has been told my the moderators to Frank ...
From my perspective it was a valid and very needed fix that helped many when they could still see it. Frank took a great deal of time to look at this and come up with a solution for the many users that can't upgrade due to financial reasons, hardship or simply by choice. Would it matter if a user was re directed to google as they make that choice to do so?... why should this be seen as a valid and required issue to act on?
Terms and conditions are fine but how can one validate to remove anything they want on a discussion forum that is in essence a post helping people, really helping on an issue that has created some disruption for Apple Mac users as can be seen on forums all over the world. To remove the post for what ever reason (advertising infringement) because they own the site and to exercise a deletion smacks of a totalitarian aspect of governance over a discussion that was of benefit to many. How does this sit with Apple's promise to customers within Apple’s Brand Experience? Why not suggest a change/edit to Frank's post to fit in with 'requirements'... work with the customers and end users... help us... please?
"Apple is committed to bringing the best personal computing experience to students, educators, creative professionals and consumers around the world through its innovative hardware, software and Internet offerings." the best personal experience? come on... help me out here... make sure the experience is there to help those on Apple Mac machines that run older versions of OS and Safari by choice or necessity and that if a fix is known it is passed on...
It is sad that there are people still posting on this thread that do not know the fix Frank has created as it has been removed... they are still saying what has happened regarding the search engine in question and scrabbling about for an answer and get a negative closed door... come on... how about some empathy for those that can't upgrade as is always the suggested reply... are legacy customers not due some respect and empathy on this?... All Apple users are created equal but some are more equal than others?
I ask why should Apple not wish the fix to be known? I cannot believe this is related to an advertising aspect... if not why not invite Frank to post his fix on this thread as he did on the google boards with images etc without the links being needed then, so no breach of advertising and actually support this but with the safety caveat that Apple cannot be held responsible for this fix... complete with safety clause...?
I really find it disappointing... as a graphic designer since the early 70s and using Macs from day one as a professional designer I have lived and gone through many changes, even worked with all the third party programme developers as a beta tester and pulled my hair out at oddities and OS fixes and upgrades but always found Apple were really listening and I in turn resisted the agencies I worked for that were using PCs... now? I am not so sure as the thin end gets thinner....
It will be what it is..
Thanks Frank for your sterling efforts, for me they are very much appreciated, and the Mac world needs people like you that show some empathy and care for fellow mac users. I doff my cap.