I have nothing to do with Windows, nor Microsoft and although I use them at work and occasionally at home I have limited liking for their platform. I love Visual Studio IDE, as it is on par if not better than X-code. Old backup NTSF drives work in Windows, far from seamlessly, but they work and Microsoft support has been helpful to resolve known issues. I am really disappointed that the responses from AAPL are "sorry, you have to live with inconvenience". It is sad that a Unix based platform is restricted not because of incompetence or licensing, but because this way the Apple products are kept intact and customer is reminded to stay away from competitive products. If AAPL products are so great, why are they afraid that competition from an unsupported will encroach on their turf? Makes me question the legendary reliability of Mac OS. Second thing I do not like is the bundling of closed system components and the resulting limited system inter-operability. Excuses that NTSF is unstable and has bugs are lame and of bad taste, and really not in the DNA of Apple. If they are, then too bad, maybe a sign to rethink the value of the company. No this smells like a cheap competition barrier and adds development cost to port older systems. I have a fix, but it entails development costs and weakens my argument to migrate to add Mac OS to enterprise ecosystem.
Now add to this the recent tax blow-up again in the context of unfair competition and prior war with Google and Samsun, I really question what AAPL is doing. This is not a criticism, rather an honest reflection of an observer. AAPL may take it or ignore it, but I would seriously reconsider investment plans.