MrHoffman wrote:
Open up all your protections, post your passwords, do whatever you want. Don't like SIP? Turn it off. Don't want the firewall? Turn it off. Don't like how the EFI console works? Refit it. Need to tweak or adjust or alter OS X? Have at. It's your Mac, after all.
Now if I wanted to exercise control over the platform — and there are valid reasons for needing or wanting that — then a "target practice" scratch OS X system or more likely a Linux or BSD system would be a better choice than OS X. Why? Because the path you're on — fighting against what Apple is doing with OS X here — is likely going to lead to more issues and incompatibilities and oddities. Things are only going to get more locked down over time, too.
As annoying as it is to have to decide to disable the protections or to keep the protections with more limited access (or to migrate platforms), what Apple is doing here is a viable way to reduce the amount of malware that's targeting OS X. There just aren't many good ways to keep a lid on the dreck that's around, and increasingly targeting OS X.
But this is your Mac. You do not need to justify running it over with a truck or throwing it off a building, if that's what you want to do. Much less disable SIP. Your Mac. Your call.
Hi.
I don´t need to be so condescending... It´s clear, My iMac, my rules... Your iMac your rules... But not the question to me... It´s a forum, people free to ask or answer question, It´s a debate definitely 🙂
Apple try to justify closed system telling everyone that SIP is necesary, SIP is the best, SIP is good!!! but I think that one function of SIP is take away control at least to "power user". As solder the components... slimmer iMac... by user can´t touch your property system...
I havn´t studied much SIP "heart" (I said I'm security analyst) but I´m sure that it´s smokescreen in 80% funcions...
Only I tell, that SIP has more problems to power user that solutions...
Thanks!