Apple Event: May 7th at 7 am PT

Looks like no one’s replied in a while. To start the conversation again, simply ask a new question.

Aperture to What?

I like Aperture but that is a dead end road. At some point it will all break. Keeping iPhones, some older, some new, iPads and iMacs/Macbooks all in synch and working together is a challenge, but as long as you update to the latest, not on day 1, but once things look good, in general are ok to upgrade. Indon't want to get into a situation where Aperture breaks and I am forced to find a replacement. Yes I know Aprrture is technically supported but the farther we go the priority on support lowers. The current Apple Photos products are not a replacement for Aperture. So....


I have over 1TB of photos and 2TB of video and need a professional app.


i don't know what is the "default" replacement choice for most is but I kind of think the Adobe $9.99 Lightroom/Photoshop offering is the wat to go.


comments on what solutions folks are using to replace Aperture.

Aperture 3, OS X Yosemite (10.10.1)

Posted on Jan 26, 2016 8:44 AM

Reply
66 replies

Apr 2, 2016 1:46 AM in response to Allan Eckert

Capture One looks OK but I wasn't blown away by the trial. It's price continues to rise too, that said, I'm not sure what the actual price is now. The website keeps giving me a price of 279 Euro whether I select Malaysia as my home country (where I live) or the UK. One should be different because of VAT issues so the 'buy now' page needs some attention.


I was always put off by the Adobe subscription model but since C1 went up by 50 or 70 odd Euros it looks more attractive. I'm not so much into photography that I really needed C1 at 200 Euro, certainly not at 279. Maybe if we are lucky Photos will be developed more over the next 1-2 years. As it stands, the prosumer market is a bit sparse, the options aren't that great, and they are certainly not cheap.

Apr 2, 2016 8:15 AM in response to TechAddict

There are so many people floating in this boat. My friends who have been happily using Aperture since Apple's introduction, are for the moment doing nothing. I have subscribed to Adobe's LR, PS etc. LR is no substitute for Aperture and I am not so pleased with the on-line system. I have looked at phase one and have decided to wait it out as long as possible with Aperure.

Apr 2, 2016 8:32 AM in response to KateAlex43

waiting it out is what most seem to be happiest with. Lightroom migration process is ****.


For me a funny combination of Photos.app for initial processing and leveraging iCloud photo library with Aperture for storage is working reasonably well:


Gordon's Tech: iCloud Photo Library, Photos.app and my Aperture plan (plus Aperture Exporter)


We just have to see what Photos.app is like in 1-2 years. I may stay on Yosemite, certainly won't go beyond El Capitan.


The entire market for longterm photo storage and retrieval is dying. Not just Apple leaving, MSFT and Google too. There's not enough demand to support a single platform app -- needs to be Windows too. Aperture could never be ported to Windows. Curious sociologic shift.


I think in future all prosumer apps will be software rental...

Apr 2, 2016 9:21 AM in response to jfaughnan

Waiting things out with Aperture has become a pretty viable option, especially since Google recently has released the NIK Collection of Plugins for free:


https://plus.google.com/+NikCollection/posts/AFGsG2Di7EK

Add to that the very good MacPhun Creative Kit Plugins and you have a pretty powerful DAM and image editing package.

https://macphun.com/de/creativekit

The only problem is the big unknown, if future OS X versions sometime down the road will break Aperture. But if you are pretty sure to stick to your current hardware and OS X version for the near future and don't want to upgrade your camera every year, there's no reason to totally abandon Aperture right now.

Aperture to What?

Welcome to Apple Support Community
A forum where Apple customers help each other with their products. Get started with your Apple ID.