You can make a difference in the Apple Support Community!

When you sign up with your Apple Account, you can provide valuable feedback to other community members by upvoting helpful replies and User Tips.

Looks like no one’s replied in a while. To start the conversation again, simply ask a new question.

photoanalysisd taking large amounts of cpu

After upgrade to OS X Sierra - I'm assuming it's doing something to my photos....



Any thoughts?

MacBook Pro, Mac OS X (10.7)

Posted on Sep 21, 2016 7:38 AM

Reply
Question marked as Top-ranking reply

Posted on Jul 12, 2017 9:07 AM

Your recollection is flawed. Excerpted from Faces overview:


"When you open iPhoto ’11, iPhoto automatically scans your photo library and groups likely matches."


Nevertheless, if you don't like Photos, then don't use it. There are many other photo-organizing apps from which to choose.

85 replies

Sep 28, 2016 8:55 AM in response to DonFromCanada

The system is processing your photos - when completed you'll be able to query your library in clever ways.


You can force the photoanalysis daemon to pause by opening the Photos app - it suspends

activity while the app is open. (If you minimise the app photoanalysisd will spring back to life, however.)


If you click on "people" in the left hand sidebar of the Photos app, it tells you how many photos it has processed, and how many are remaining.

Oct 8, 2016 3:01 AM in response to m.wooldridge

While I do appreciate this is what it's doing -- Why in the world is Apple processing photos in the background WHILE I'm using my machine?! This seems just absolutely insane to me, this going on while I'm TRYING to work with editing a 4k video... Sure, even if the process is set to a low priority, it's still using up cpu cycles that could be more helpful toward WHAT I'm doing. Why not do this when my computer is locked?!? Even then, it should tell me it's doing something like that, what if I've got a render going?! /sigh.

Oct 20, 2016 9:37 AM in response to Ghaniba

Exactly! This is ridiculous. Just updated to Sierra yesterday. My mac was perfectly silent on Yosemite... now my mac is almost burning flames out of it's CPU... It'd take too much to notify the user what's going to happen so that I don't have to spend my time googling this problem... Apple common you can do it better. I hope this process won't take forever. Apparently, it's not a coincidence that multiple people are trying to get an answer to this....

Oct 27, 2016 4:33 AM in response to DonFromCanada

So when the Photos app is open, it hogs the CPU and now when it's closed...it hogs the CPU! I've got nearly 40,000 pix to scan and it's managed just over 1,000 in the 5 hours I've been using my Mac post-upgrade so I've got 8 more Mac-operating days to go.


I've been procrastinating on a switch to Adobe Lightroom for the past year and it looks like this will be the perfect motivation. Probably not intended but well done Apple OS Team :-)


https://helpx.adobe.com/lightroom/help/import-iphoto.html

Oct 27, 2016 4:05 PM in response to William Tomcanin

I've got an older (late 2009) iMac, and after 6 hours, only 1500 of 18,000 photos have been scanned. Apple ought to give the user an option (1) to reduce the priority of the photoanalysisd task, (2) forget People analysis (I don't use it -- perhaps this new analysis will improve its accuracy and recall, but Faces in iPhoto was laughable, making way too many errors of omission or commission) or at least allow the user to turn it off so a rational backup can be completed, (3) schedule it for off-hours, or all of the above.

Oct 28, 2016 7:46 AM in response to Kevin in Colorado

After 10 hours...

User uploaded file

Scanning all the photos might make sense for relatively small collections or entirely unorganized collections. I've got photos going back to 2007 that are well organized (previously into iPhoto "events"). Most of these are now archival "albums" but used only for reference or to find a particular photo if needed. I don't need "people" or "faces" for that. They are already labeled, grouped, and classified. In all there are 233 of these archival albums. There are only 53 albums that I actively share or view, including 28 albums from this year that we are actively using and organizing.


Perhaps Apple could allow us to flag albums or collections of photos as archival, then give the option to scan or not. Or as in iTunes, where we get to choose events and albums to sync with our other devices, provide a list of albums with checkboxes for different levels of automated photo analysis. At least for those of us who need them.

Oct 28, 2016 11:47 AM in response to i_cola

Hello i_cola ...

The link you gave for Lightroom import of pictures is only for iPhoto and Aperture, not the Photos app on the Mac. To import the Photos library on the Mac, you have to first use Finder to create an "alias" file for the actual Photos Library, then import that "alias" instead. It will then import both the original pics and videos, and the .jpg for any that you may have edited. Good luck!

photoanalysisd taking large amounts of cpu

Welcome to Apple Support Community
A forum where Apple customers help each other with their products. Get started with your Apple Account.