I have had a business class relationship with Apple, of one sort or another, since 1990. I worked with Apple's government/business approved vendors/consultants through 2006 when the Apple Store business model became standard in my region.
The ten Apple ID accounts that I currently hold date back to the first of the .Mac days. And, I certainly did have the .Mac system recommended for my practice.
I would have to look up the record, but I believe that it was 2006 that I hired a consulting firm out of Cleveland to integrate iCal with my small-firm docketing needs. The referral came from the business representative at the new Apple Store. As I recall, the front end cost about $2,500.00 and ran concurrently on a number of iBooks, a goose-neck iMac, and several windows boxes.
I don't doubt that those types of special adaptations are readily available today. My point is that I adopted the system specifically for my law practice with the assistance of Apple's own business rep.
As far as Email SPAM goes, I can tell you when the Spammers went all out - in my case it was 1997 when my copy of Eudora went chugging along and about October I jumped from 100k emails/domain to 3.5 meg by the end of the year.
I employ a number of filtering strategies and I have many email accounts that are dedicated to one task (e.g. all US District Court email).
The iCal SPAM is devistating where there may be no defense against the Spammer and liability is very high. Miss a deadline and call the malpractice carrier high.
No, I really don't like the Lexis docket. I really don't like the idea of the cost, the potential for security breach, and the limitations it imposes. But, I don't have the luxury to wait and see what kind of fix iCal receives.
Right now the biggest Spam problem I face is VOIP SPIT. My office lines field thousands of these and I've had call filtering hardware installed to block much, but not all, of that time-stealing nuisance.
<Edited by Host>