Using Capture One as Aperture alternative

I have just spent some time viewing Capture One tutorials and webinars. I am duly impressed by its capabilities and options. I have downloaded the Trial version to test.

Have others who may have used (or, are using) Capture One (CO) exclusively as an Aperture alternative found any negative aspects to the CO software?

I understand I can import Aperture libraries. Do keywords get imported? If not, is there a way to use keywords already in Aperture in CO?

I'm still put off by the price of CO, but I am trying to persuade myself that the capabilities and power of CO make it a better deal than it seems on first glance.


Thanks for your help and advice.

iPhone 6s, iOS 11.2.5

Posted on Feb 7, 2018 10:34 AM

Reply
6 replies

Feb 24, 2018 7:57 AM in response to Gerald Gifford

Hi Gerald


I used Co1 for a few years but what I missed is the folder system (DAM) that apertures

if us use managed files inco1 there is no way you can be sure if all the folders are in your projects

also it is very slow if you want to store lets say 40000 photos in it

the search function is slow

the editing is very good but the rest is a bit slow

that is why I cave up and started to use Aperture

but agin it is a matter of taste.

my tip use reference files, or wait until the got it fixed

if you see at phase one forums there are my who complain about the speed with it comes to the DAM function



Henrik

Mar 14, 2018 8:08 AM in response to Gerald Gifford

I've been using Capture One for over 2 years now, after being on Aperture for at least 5 years, and my photos have never looked better. The Raw conversion on Capture One is just outstanding, way better than Lightroom IMO. Speaking of, I did try Lightroom for a few days, but Capture One felt closer to the Aperture style interface.


I do miss the organization structure of Aperture, but overall I don't regret switching over.

Mar 8, 2018 11:11 PM in response to Gerald Gifford

This is my take on using Capture One as an alternative to Apple's Aperture.

I have downloaded and used Capture One image editor for all of the free trial time offered by Phase One.

I had settled on using Lightroom as my Aperture replacement and had been dissatisfied by LR's unintuitive handling of images and it's inability to organize my images and make them easy to find. The editing capabilities of LR are top level. My dislike is the extra effort it takes to access and process an image and the inability to know where my original and edited images were being stored. There is a lot of moving sliders, opening modules, and waiting for things to happen. Simply uploading and importing images can be time consuming and frustrating. Similarly, exporting edited images is not a simple, quick thing to do. These are the primary reasons I decide to try CO.

CO, in my opinion, has many of the negative aspects of LR. Some procedures are more pronounced than LR in their need for tweaking and tuning in order to carry out some processing function. I watched a video which was supposed to train me how to organize my images 3 or 4 times. Maybe I am a dunce? I was never able to create a catalog which had a structure that would intuitively allow me to know where my images were and to be able find those images weeks or months later. I think the CO RAW editor handles my Canon RAW images in a way which produces image colors which I felt were not accurate and required more extra processing than they should have. CO requires a lot of mouse/trackpad action to carry the image from import to exporting the final edited picture. Though it may be possible (not by me) to create a preset to accomplish many functions. I found CO too complicated and too full of links, boxes to check, and sliders to slide to be of use to me. The DAM aspect was nonexistent. Smart Albums are useful to organize small or exclusive groups of images, but there is no way to organize those albums leaving you with questions about where any giving image is located.

On the positive side CO purports to handle key words in a different and, possible better way by utilizing a keyword library. If you can learn how to use it I think it would be very handy. As mention earlier the ability to create presets could be a decided link clicking and time saving asset if you can master the preset creation process.

Feb 7, 2018 9:57 PM in response to Gerald Gifford

CaptureOne takes some getting used to, as it's designed for the professional market, as a result many of its concepts are different and of course the UI is different. But the controls are way more powerful than Aperture's. You might enjoy reading "Aperture, Capture One and Lightroom Walk Into a Bar."


I used the CaptureOne trial for awhile and participated in a few of their webinars. I was pretty impressed, especially about its handling of tethered captures. I consider myself an advanced amateur with some professional leanings but have to admit I'm not quite ready to buy CaptureOne. The learning curve is pretty steep and I'm actually thinking the $599 2-day certification course at Digital Transitions would be a better deal than the straight license because it includes the license, 2 days of hands-on training, some extras and a certification exam. I'd do it just to get the training instead of slogging through CaptureOne on my own.

Alternatively, since you are in testing mode, may I suggest looking at Luminar also. It's only $69 and there is a Digital Asset Management module planned for release this year (at no additional cost). I've been playing with Luminar since it was first released and the new 2018 version is a huge step up against Photoshop and Lightroom. As more features are added I think it will eventually compete effectively against CaptureOne. Not much is known about Luminar's upcoming DAM features yet but I suspect it will be pretty good and that they will include importing tools for Aperture and Lightroom libraries. Here's a review you may find helpful.

Mar 14, 2018 1:01 PM in response to tmlim

Interesting!

I found very, very little similarity with Aperture. On the other hand, Capture One did remind me of Lightroom to a very great extent. (Lots of clicking around to find the right editing module or preset to do my job.)

As I said earlier, I got the feeling that the RAW converter gave me slightly odd looking images which I was required to 'tweek' a little to bring them to the look I was used to and preferred.

Would agree that given time and the right processing Capture One does give good editing results.

This thread has been closed by the system or the community team. You may vote for any posts you find helpful, or search the Community for additional answers.

Using Capture One as Aperture alternative

Welcome to Apple Support Community
A forum where Apple customers help each other with their products. Get started with your Apple Account.