Matrox MXO compared to new HDLink Pro?

I know a lot of you like the Matrox MXO for it's broadcast ability to a computer monitor (Shane). But how does the new HDLink Pro compare to the Matrox MXO? It seems like they perform the similar tasks - full resolution HD montioring on LCD displays mainly.

Any general thoughts? I'm looking at both but it seems like the Matrox MXO is more geared toward SD, HDV, and DVCProHD - my cup of tea.

G5 Dual 2GHz (June 2004 edition) Mac OS X (10.4.6) 3MB RAM, 250GB HD, Nvidia GeForce 7800 GS 256MB

Posted on May 1, 2007 2:37 PM

Reply
10 replies

May 1, 2007 2:57 PM in response to Z1User

Z1...he's talking about the HDLINK PRO...that is a box that converts HD SDI to DVI...it isn't a capture card. It, like the MXO, only outputs video.

BUT...unlike the MXO, you need a capture card already if you want to use the HD LINK...it takes SDI inputs only. The MXO connects to your computer via a DVI port. No additional hardware needed.

All the HDLINK can do is send a signal to a DVI monitor.

Shane
User uploaded file

May 1, 2007 3:04 PM in response to Shane Ross

The Aja HDP is easier to use. Connect it and boot. That's it.

The HDLink OTOH has required the installation of the HDLink Utility app on both MacPros I've tried to use it with before it would display anything on a 23" Apple Cinema HD Display.

BMD claims it will work right out of the box, but I'm 0 for 2 trying that.

Also, the HDLink didn't properly scale down to display DV clips. They looked like they were larger than 1280 X 720 to my eye. Certainly not 720 X 480, not even close.

May 1, 2007 3:15 PM in response to Adam Tirapelle

The other things, in addition to what Shane mentioned, is that the MXO allows you to not only use your second monitor as a regular second monitor/extended desktop, but it also lets you downconvert and output to an NTSC Monitor from several different apps like P-shop and after effects, or output and/or record a scaled full desktop monitor's activites...like for live presentations over a projector of on a big-screen TV.

May 1, 2007 3:48 PM in response to Adam Tirapelle

The main use of the MXO (of which I'm a real fan) is to be able to monitor true HD on a 23" Cinema Display... saves money... It will also send SDI to a real HD monitor, and SD to an SD monitor... that's cool too. IT's very clean indeed, and with the new drivers from Matrox, you can calibrate a Cinema Display just as you would a "real" HD monitor. (so you're monitoring HD for about 1800 bucks total with the 23" CD...) Next step up would be a Panasonic HD monitor (LCD) and it would start about $3200... the Matrox could feed that too.

Thing is the CD looks good enough to my old eyes for most all the work out there. If you were working in say, 2 k or something maybe it's not good enough, but hey, it's all up to how the viewer has setup his TV or HD display too.

Course you could go first cabin and do an Io HD for your HDV captures (using the new Pro Res 4:2:2 codec), and feed it's output to a real HD monitor... or to any monitor lcd or plasma that has an HDMI input...

.Jerry

May 1, 2007 6:35 PM in response to Z1User

The problem with them is calibrating them. You really can't. if we're talking consumer stuff.

No Blue only gun display or way to send it to it...

Matrox figured that one, and their tech is so proprietary that they own this one... cool freaking idea. You send the DVI out from your computer to a CD, the box turns it into a broadcastable set-upable display. Has a blue only setup with the normal proc amp controls you'll see on any TV it manages to do in it's control panel.

The box works for native HDV output, HD anything...

It uses FCP's full screen commands to activate it.

I love this thing. it's saving us a ton if all we need to see is 23"... Send the DVI to a 23" for you AND send the signal to a plasma for the client... setup the 23, then setup the plasma by eyballing it. viola close enough for 90 percent of the work out there.

it was the blue only, control amp that did the trick...

The decklink product can't drive a computer display too...THAT is what makes the MXO unique.

The HDLink though can load lookup tables... pretty keen if you need to do that. Pro colorists would need this.

Jerry

This thread has been closed by the system or the community team. You may vote for any posts you find helpful, or search the Community for additional answers.

Matrox MXO compared to new HDLink Pro?

Welcome to Apple Support Community
A forum where Apple customers help each other with their products. Get started with your Apple Account.