SMB alternative

Ok after a hectic two weeks of no joy SMB in 10.5.5 I have given up.

Does any one know any way to install an alternative version of SMB into server 10.5.5.

I have spent untold hours trying to resolve the SMB issue that 10.5 has with no luck. I have spoken to apple and they appear know about it. The reports on the internet are all different and I have come to the conclusion that different programs react in different ways to the SMB sharing that 10.5 server provides. Some apps can write to the shares but not read from them. Others can read, but not write some can not do either.

I have tried just about every combination of permissions using acls, posix and propagating both. Tried this in OD mode and local dir mode Nothing fix's it. A college of mine came up against the same thing today with another windows program not being able to open files off a 10.5 server.

Another issue I have is my intranet which is a linux machine. It access pdf's stored on the server. It logs in with a user name and password using SMB, but again it can not load the pdf's because the SMB permissions are all wrong.

I came across this today while trying to find a solution. http://www.thursby.com/products/dave.html I installed the demo and straight away the programs I am having trouble with work. Only problem is it seems to share out folders to users and not groups which does not help me with an 80+ user network.

So I am pretty much sitting with an xserve that is absolutely useless to me because I can not use it. Apple have told me I can not install 10.4 server onto the xserve because it will not work. True or not I don't know.

Really this needs to be sorted out and quick.


To quote apple

http://www.apple.com/server/macosx/features/filesharing.html

"Sharing made easy.
It’s easy to share hard drives or individual folders and assign custom access permissions with Mac OS X Server. To facilitate collaboration, each group gets its own shared folder on the server. Whether they’re on Mac or PC systems, all group members can read and write to files in the shared folder, just as if they were using their own hard drive."

Blatantly not true. I am pretty annoyed with this now as I have to switch back to the 10.4 server and have no use for my new 10.5.5 xserve. Apple said they will not exchange it even though it does not do what they say it does. This xserve has been sitting doing nothing for the last 6 months because apple have yet to fix the issue.

If some one can solve my problem I will be more than happy, but if not what a waste of time. My advice would be to any one do not buy or upgrade to 10.5 server if you need SMB sharing in any way until this issue has been fixed.

xserve 2x3ghz quad core 14gig ram 2x80gig sas drives XRAID, Mac OS X (10.5.5)

Posted on Oct 24, 2008 12:47 PM

Reply
28 replies

Mar 2, 2009 8:47 AM in response to adrmaas

Thanks for your suggestion.

I'll have to try it later because right now, my users are logged in their accounts and I'd prefer not having to restart the SMB service while users are using it...

Also, I wanted to know... In my /var/db/smb.conf, in the [netlogon] section, I have a "oplocks = yes". If I add a "oplocks = no" in my /etc/smb.conf file, could this create a conflict or something ?.

Mar 2, 2009 9:03 AM in response to adrmaas

So your guess is that if i move my [global] section of my /etc/smb.conf at the end of the file and I write "oplocks = no", it should be OK...

Another question, in Server Admin, in the SMB Sharing properties of my "NetUsers" shared folder, there is a "Enable oplocks" option which is checked right now. If I simply uncheck this, will it have the same effect as hardcoding it directly in the smb.conf file?

Mar 2, 2009 9:20 AM in response to HitmanPM

Sounds like a better option than messing with the config. Not sure if it would still require smb to be restarted.

You could double check via the command line to confirm the configuration by opening the terminal and issuing the following command:

testparm

It should display the configuration parameters as the server understands them.

Mar 2, 2009 12:32 PM in response to adrmaas

Well, I've disabled "oplocks" on the SMB share using Server Admin and it is still crashing. I guess the next step would be to do the changes directly in the smb.conf file. But as I said earlier, I don't know when I'll be able to do thoses changes, since I don't want to do that when there are users working...

I'll post my results when I get them. In the meantime, if anyone has another idea....

Again, thanks.

May 5, 2009 5:41 AM in response to skeates

I had been dealing with this issue for the past couple of months, I thought the issue was the client systems, it is a bit of a relief to know that I wasn't messing up with being unable to figure out what was wrong with these systems, but now it is a hassle to see that it may be a problem that currently has no fix.

Has anyone here made any headway with this issue?

May 26, 2009 8:45 AM in response to skeates

There finally looks to be a fix written up by apple for this problem.
http://support.apple.com/kb/TS2719


**
1. In the /etc/smb.conf file, under the "Site-specific parameters" section, add the following lines to the end file:

[global] "change notify = no"

2. Save the changes
3. Restart the SMB service
**

I'm applying this fix this afternoon and will post if it works or not.

This thread has been closed by the system or the community team. You may vote for any posts you find helpful, or search the Community for additional answers.

SMB alternative

Welcome to Apple Support Community
A forum where Apple customers help each other with their products. Get started with your Apple Account.