kre62 wrote:
Apple is trying to convince us that this issue "exists in all smartphones" and that its caused by the hand physically blocking the antennae. Heres their education on it:
http://www.apple.com/antenna/
However, if the case is the hand blocking the antennae, as they want us to believe, then how come the iPhone4's signal problems can be reproduced without even touching the phone?
There are many videos of the phones antennae being shorted with a house key, part of a paper clip, etc, with the users hand nowhere near the phone. In fact, the person could stand 100 yards away and zoom in and see the signal gone with just a staple covering the black line.
Basically what I'm saying is, just because the result is similar does not mean its the same issue.
They should have announced a hardware fix, along with the bumpers for now. A simple polymer coating of the antennae, to reduce conductivity, would have fixed the problem, not required new FCC approval, and cost probably 25 cents per phone to implement.
Message was edited by: kre62
kre62 wrote:
Apple is trying to convince us that this issue "exists in all smartphones" and that its caused by the hand physically blocking the antennae. Heres their education on it:
http://www.apple.com/antenna/
However, if the case is the hand blocking the antennae, as they want us to believe, then how come the iPhone4's signal problems can be reproduced without even touching the phone?
There are many videos of the phones antennae being shorted with a house key, part of a paper clip, etc, with the users hand nowhere near the phone. In fact, the person could stand 100 yards away and zoom in and see the signal gone with just a staple covering the black line.
Basically what I'm saying is, just because the result is similar does not mean its the same issue.
They should have announced a hardware fix, along with the bumpers for now. A simple polymer coating of the antennae, to reduce conductivity, would have fixed the problem, not required new FCC approval, and cost probably 25 cents per phone to implement.
Message was edited by: kre62
Originally Posted by RickieVz
After being a 5 year subscriber to Consumer Report I have cancelled my subscription. The lady asked me why, and I told her because of the stupid report you guys did regarding the iPhone 4 without having data and not knowing that other smartphone has the same problem.
She told me I wasn't the first to cancel.
If your phone lost reception when you touched the 'sweet spot' with one finger, and dropped a call in under 10 seconds, would you still be upset with Consumer Reports? That's exactly the problem I had before returning my phone.
I don't understand why everyone is so upset with CR. I'm a consumer, I have the issue, and they attempted to reproduce it because the "issue" exploded in the media. They were able to reproduce it and although they give it excellent marks in nearly all categories, they can't recommend it because there is a major design issue, even if it is only affecting a small number of people.
Why is that so wrong? It's not like Consumer Reports doesn't provide their entire review. Readers can decide for themselves.
-MacRumors Forums.
Why should CR recommend iPhone 4 just because Job's provided a band-aid to "fix" a shotgun wound? I left Apple for Android and I am happy about it. But my phone has problems of it's own. I think it's a shame to cover up the design of a 4 with a rubber band, but I would do it. Jobs is not going to do anything more. He is one stubborn *******, one super rich *******. Good for him.
Bottom line, I will continue to say the iphone ***** and you will continue to say android *****. We need to vent our anger somehow. Life goes on.
P.S. As Mel Gibson would say, Chuck Schumer can blow me first. The market will determine any punishment, the government can F off!
Both of these messages are from MacRumors. I agree with them 100%