Canoscan LIDE 300 or 400 or...?
I upgraded to Mac OS Catalina (10.15.04), so now my dependable old Canoscan LIDE 70 will no longer work. I understand it's because it's only a 32 bit machine, and Catalina only works with 64 bit.
So that means I either have to get 1) an external hard drive or virtual OS in Mac OS Mohave (10.14), which worked with my Canoscan LIDE 70. Such things already go beyond my technical understanding, Or 2) a new Canoscan in 64 bit. #2, a new scanner, appears to be my simplest choice.
So now money enters in here, as well, but I'm guessing price will be about the same. Since Canon products have always worked so well with Mac, I would prefer staying with Canon, though others are advising to go to Epson.
So that's my discussion. Here's my questions.
I am only an occasional user of the scanner but it's come in very handy for reproducing photographs or producing online photographs of high quality (or so it seems to me). I don't need a professional quality scanner.
- What would you recommend for a 64 bit scanner — the Canoscan LIDE 300 or 400?
- I used to use a Canoscan toolbox to interface with the scanner, but that disappeared with Catalina. So will I need a VueScan (9x.7x.27) for 64 bit (about $40 for a basic), or does Apple make an appropriate interface for a Canoscan?
I sincerely appreciate any knowledgeable help I am offered!
Doknyx
iMac 21.5", macOS 10.14