Looks like no one’s replied in a while. To start the conversation again, simply ask a new question.

Performance of SSD disks on Mac Mini M1 per USB 3.2 gen 2

After weeks of trying to find a solution to my performance problem with my Samsung SSD disks (T5 and T7 Touch), it seems that the explanation is the following:


There are two different USB 3.2 gen 2 standard, one is "1x2" the other "2x1".

The Samsung devices require "2x1" which means that they need 2 USB lanes to reach full perfomance.


But the Mac Mini, esp. when the disks are connected to a Thunderbold Dock, only gives ONE lane instead.

This results in the maximum of about 500 MB/s for such disks!


If this is a bug in Big Sur, I strongly urge Apple to fix this and give 2 USB lanes to such SSD drives, or in general USB-C devices!


If this is NOT a bug in Bug Sur, but a hardware problem of the M1, we have a serious problem!


Apple should be more open in explaining the standard used and supported!

The constant habit of just trying to support only their own stuff is annoying!

This will never ever happen, better learn to support standard and work together with other companies!




So, can I get the answer to my above question in this very forum?


Can macOS be fixed to support USB 3.2 gen 1x2 and not only 2x1?

Or is this a hardware problem?


Many thanks


Mac mini, macOS 11.5

Posted on Aug 27, 2021 9:39 AM

Reply
Question marked as Best reply

Posted on Aug 30, 2021 12:49 PM

FWIW, the USB consortium turned USB into a nebulous mess with USB3 and vendors often leave the fine details of the spec out on their specific products. Just USB 3.2 has 4 different flavors. Here is a score card to keep things straight:


They could have specified one 5 Gbps configuration and on 10e Gbps configuration. But nooooo.

Similar questions

69 replies

Aug 31, 2021 12:40 PM in response to hcsitas

It seems pointless to discuss this with you.


You simply ignore the fact that the same devices perform fine on Windows and non-M1 Macs.


Any Apple customer with a non-M1 Mac and any of those devices with hit a 50% performance loss as soon as they "upgrade" to a M1.


And this is perfectly fine for you?

Apple should not give a warning?

Or better, a fix?


If you indeed think so, I don't really understand why you even reply ;-)


Aug 31, 2021 1:38 PM in response to Forced_to_use_a_username

I’m not responding to every claim or counter-claim other than to address your issue with your Samsung drive’s performance/bug/quirks in their USB implementation. It needs to be directed to them first. If they won’t address it directly or respond comprehensively, which is clearly the case here, you should take it up further with them or await a manufacturer with a product that does that. All the best.

Aug 31, 2021 1:54 PM in response to hcsitas

It does not need to be directed to Samsung or any other vendor!


Some of their - and other vendors - products use an official USB 3.x gen 2 protocol that uses, expects and requires 2 USB lanes, which will be combined to get 10Gb/s ...

Totally valid.


Just have a look at the protocol screenshot.


Apple did support this, but silently dropped support on the M1 machines, probably because of changes in the hardware.

The disk vendors cannot do nothing about this!


Sep 2, 2021 9:43 AM in response to Forced_to_use_a_username

That, Forced_to_use_a_username, literally, changes nearly nothing, from what I stated concerning the USB-C connectors, that are running USB4. All you need do is look up the USB4 specification.


It does, however, indicate that the USB-A ports are less capable than I thought. (I don’t expect much of such ports anyway.)


When you check the USB4 specification, you will see which “USB 3.1 Gen 2 (up to 10Gb/s)” is supported.

Sep 2, 2021 12:06 PM in response to Halliday

Forced_to_use_a_username:


For the USB4 standard, I recommend the ZIP file found at https://www.usb.org/document-library/usb4tm-specification.


Note: Support for the USB3 protocols is obtained via “tunneling”, just as for a number of other protocols. This can severely limit direct compatibility, especially through intervening non-USB4 devices (such as non-USB4 hubs). In addition, this can mean that the negotiated protocol may well drop down to the common USB2.


I recommend you start at page “-11-“, for an Overview and System Description.

Sep 3, 2021 9:40 AM in response to Forced_to_use_a_username

Forced_to_use_a_username wrote:

Apple states that USB 3.x is supporterd "up to 10 Gb/s" which may to true, but it is - as a fact - not true for both of the variants that allow to reach 10 Gb/s ....

Only ONE of them is supported in M1, [while] BOTH of them are supported for older Apple hardware.

Even the «USB 3.x … supporterd "up to 10 Gb/s"», on the USB4 ports, may not be supported via anything direct, but via the “tunneling” I mentioned. (To do otherwise would seem to be an extension of the USB4 specification. Certainly not impossible, however.)


Additionally, while «BOTH» «USB 3.x … supporterd "up to 10 Gb/s"» «are supported for older Apple hardware», that’s only because the USB-C ports on such «older Apple hardware» are using the older USB3 standard. Not the newer USB4 standard.


Given time, more third party products will move to the new USB4 standard.

Sep 3, 2021 11:22 AM in response to Forced_to_use_a_username

Why not open a fresh discussion with your disks connected and ready for testing and let’s see where the problem really is. If you’re up to it, be prepared to have an open mind and keep the discussion technical and limited to your particular issue so folks here can help. Think about it. You may not arrive at a solution this way but you might have better information to pursue one. All the best!

Sep 4, 2021 2:42 PM in response to Forced_to_use_a_username

Forced_to_use_a_username wrote:

If the USB4 port are just USB4 and not fully and really capable of the existing USB3 standard, Apple should state that.

Exactly this is, what I am constantly repeating.

But Apple did not make that public, for whatever reasons.

And this proved to make many problems for many customers of them!

You could just as easily blame Samsung and their T7 spec for not specifying that to achieve their claimed transfer speeds, a dual lane USB controller is required, which they make zero mention of. Actually, any SSD vendor could be blamed if they require two lanes to achieve their speed.



Sep 5, 2021 4:37 AM in response to hcsitas

hcsitas wrote:

Actually, they’re using UASP which allows the drive to acknowledge tasks as completed towards the computer even though it’s outstanding on the drive side. So: fake performance, fake boasts, fake comparisons, fake accusations. What an industry! Go figure 😂

The "numbers game" and "creative advertising" have been going on for decades in anything electronic and will likely continue.


In some ways, the USB specs evolution from the simple 1.1, 2.0 and original 3.0 almost seem to been made deliberately confusing and complex to allow vendors to get "creative" in their claims.


Performance of SSD disks on Mac Mini M1 per USB 3.2 gen 2

Welcome to Apple Support Community
A forum where Apple customers help each other with their products. Get started with your Apple ID.