Really not seeing as much need for OS provided TRIM that once was a major problem in the early days of solid state disks. I've not experienced any problems with SSD external storage and a lack of TRIM support. Most all SSD manufacturers are providing vastly improved garbage collection built-in to their firmware and the functions are far more sophisticated than when SSD technology was new. Not to mention over-provisioning, although enterprise class SSDs have much more over-provisioning because they will be worked hard over a longer period of time and likely placed into RAID systems. Regular retail SSDs are now providing far more over-provisioning than in the past. Then you have encryption turned on by default in Apple T2 equipped or Apple Silicon Macs.
The way SSD flash memory works is you cannot just overwrite sectors with new data. You need to erase the sector first then write to it and that is a slow process. OS level TRIM was added to operating systems to overcome this problem. TRIM will erase sectors marked for deletion when the computer is at idle. Over time the SSD manufacturers improved their firmware garbage collection.
Forensic workers found out the hard way about firmware garbage collection. They removed a modern SSD and added a write-block physical adapter then applied power to the drive like they always did with HDDs and it would start scrubbing sectors marked for deletion with no assistance from an OS providing TRIM support. To preserve forensic data they need to desolder the flash chips from the SSD and mount them in a custom rig with their own custom firmware to avoid this problem. Hardware level encryption further complicates forensics. Apple Intel Macs with T2 chips or Apple Silicon Macs are factory encrypted using the Secure Enclave even before you turn on FileVault2. Enabling FileVault2 merely generates the recovery key and stuffs a new private key into the Secure Enclave chip which acts as a black box. It no longer needs to begin encrypting every sector as they are already encrypted at the factory. The Secure Enclave can be written to but not read from and it holds all the secrets. The operating system merely passes a public key to the Secure Enclave which answers YEA / NAY for a matching private key. The private key is never read. You can only write to the Secure Enclave or reset/erase it to start over.
The holy grail would be a new type of non-volatile RAM that retains its memory when power is removed but is just as fast if not faster than existing RAM. When that happens, it will change everything. You won't have internal storage anymore you will have unified non-volatile RAM. Operating systems will change to handle it. There will be no more sleep nor hibernation you will just switch off and when you switch on pickup where you left off. There will be no more shuffling of data from storage to RAM and back again. The memory will be just altered in place as needed on the fly. We already see the benefits of unified RAM when having an integrated GPU instead of a discrete GPU with it's own high speed RAM and the need to shuffle from storage to CPU to RAM to GPU to the GPU RAM and round trip back again. This is many orders of magnitude more efficient with Apple Silicon. Having high speed nonvolatile RAM would change everything. IBM / Intel and others are working on new materials and striving to invent nonvolatile RAM. One day they may achieve it. Perhaps with quantum computing in the coming decades.
Ultimately, you really do not need to concern yourself with an external SSD having issues due to a lack of TRIM support. Unless you are using something that is 10 years old, etc. SSD's are provisioned to likely outlast most computers normal lifespans. Internal storage is where TRIM support matters most as the data is being accessed far more often. Yes, having TRIM support is best but if you do not have it, the drives firmware will take care of it to the point where you are not really going to see massive performance degradation. If you are concerned, you can backup to another extra drive and reformat the SSD and copy the data back. But it would only be necessary after several years of heavy usage. Even then, newer drives would not only be cheaper but faster with greater capacity.