Response to IdrisSeabright
Your post: “No one here in this user-to-user forum would know the answer
to that (Apple's programming intentions).”
Of course not. What are the purposes of a forum? One of the purposes in my view
is to share concerns and issues with, in this case, Apple products. Some Forum
readers might consider, based on reading forum discussions, to post to Apple
Feedback, which might help get things done. Users helping each other directly is
not the only reason for being for a forum, in my opinion. We differ on that.
Your post: “If you're asking if you can downgrade to iOS 16, no, you
can't. If you're asking if Apple could reverse the changes, I'm sure they could
if they decided they wanted to. But, again, no one here would know anything
about that.”
Of course, there is no chance of a reversion to the previous IOS 16.
Reversion like this is extremely rare for any company, almost certainly never
for Apple historically. My suggestion is that perhaps bits of the programming
for contacts in IOS 16 could be restored to IOS 17 in a new update. I make no
technical claims on this, and my comment is a mere hope. The main point is
backtracking quickly, and then proceeding slowly with revisions.
Your post: It's not just older people complaining. I'm an older person
and I have no problem with it. So, not all older people are complaining.”
I never stated that all old people are complaining, which is your incorrect
paraphrase of my post. My statement is logically equivalent to: "Some
complainers are not old people." Your statement is logically equivalent to
"Some old people are not complainers." "Some" means
"at least one", i.e. you, no doubt others. Your statement is true,
but it does not respond to or contradict my statement, since both statements,
accurately understood, can be true at the same time.
Your post: “Meanwhile, have you submitted feedback to Apple?”
Yes. But see above on the purpose of online communities, in my view,
being at least twofold: (1) community members helping each other with specific problems;
and (2) community members sharing difficulties that they cannot help each other
with, but which might indirectly stimulate participants to convey their concerns
to the provider in question, here obviously via Apple feedback. I simply think
your apparent concept of the purposes of a forum is too restrictive.