denis9009 wrote:
Thank you!
If it's written IPS, I'm OK (cause I don't understand the details of that)?
IPS is a reference to the panel construction. IPS panels have very wide viewing angles – monitor specifications often refer to 178 degrees or thereabouts. The benefit is that if you are looking at them slightly off-center, you don't see huge, unwanted color shifts.
With TN panels – found on cheap monitors – you're much more likely to run into that problem.
These aren't the only technologies out there. For instance, I believe that OLED monitors work by having LEDs generate light for the pixels directly, rather than by shining a backlight of some sort through a LCD panel that controls how much of the backlight gets through. But if it's IPS vs. TN, I'd go with IPS every time.
As for the gory technical details of how IPS, TN, VA, etc. work … I'd have to look that up, same as you.
Like here for instance? LG 27UN850-W
That one's description says "IPS" and "sRGB 99% color". sRGB is narrow gamut.
Or this one? LG Ultrafine 27UQ850-W
It's DCI-P3 98% (is this replacing the sRGV value, cause there's nothing about it?).
If a monitor has near-100% coverage of either DCI-P3 or Adobe RGB, I'd expect it to have near-100% coverage of sRGB. DCI-P3 and Adobe RGB can both represent a wider range of colors than sRGB can, though neither DCI-P3 or Adobe RGB fully includes the other.
DCI-P3 comes from the motion picture world – the "DC" stands for "Digital Cinema". It seems to be increasingly prevalent, what with the push from the 4K TV world. I think pretty much all of Apple's screens (either built-in or standalone) these days have "Wide color (P3)" – which is presumably a claim of good coverage of DCI-P3.