Multiple Photos Libraries - I'm favouring multiple

I'm creating a huge database (in the region of 150,000 images). The media management application I currently use is rather flakey, and I'm hoping Photos will be better.

It would make sense for me to have separate Libraries - for commercial work and hobbies etc, but I read on this thread that there are no good reasons to have multiple libraries.

I dispute that.


I have a great number of keywords, and have searched in vain for a way to search for the keyword I want to add. For some reason, clicking in the keyword box in the inspector doesn't always work. (I cannot find out why) so often I have to use the keyword editor. This can take some time to find the word I want.


If I create different libraries for completely different photos, it will drastically limit the number of keywords in each library.

Or am I missing something?


Your thoughts would be appreciated.

Andy

iMac Pro, macOS 13.5

Posted on Feb 22, 2024 11:34 AM

Reply
Question marked as Top-ranking reply

Posted on Feb 22, 2024 7:05 PM

Many of us use multiple Libraries to help keep things straight. We have archival Libraries that may not change much, and a Favorites Library that is synced through iCloud with our other devices. I have a Library for work stuff, one for my parents' families, and one for my wife's parents' families. (I kept getting confused and couldn't remember who people belonged to when they were all together.) I have several others, as well.


Having too many pictures in a Library slows down searches, face IDs, Duplicate finding, and all that kind of background curation stuff. It's best to keep a Library under 40K pictures if you can.


We use the 3rd party app  PowerPhotos ($30) to help keep track of multiple libraries and to make it easier to switch among them.


The thread you linked is pretty old.


5 replies
Question marked as Top-ranking reply

Feb 22, 2024 7:05 PM in response to andynick

Many of us use multiple Libraries to help keep things straight. We have archival Libraries that may not change much, and a Favorites Library that is synced through iCloud with our other devices. I have a Library for work stuff, one for my parents' families, and one for my wife's parents' families. (I kept getting confused and couldn't remember who people belonged to when they were all together.) I have several others, as well.


Having too many pictures in a Library slows down searches, face IDs, Duplicate finding, and all that kind of background curation stuff. It's best to keep a Library under 40K pictures if you can.


We use the 3rd party app  PowerPhotos ($30) to help keep track of multiple libraries and to make it easier to switch among them.


The thread you linked is pretty old.


Feb 23, 2024 4:53 AM in response to andynick

The discussion you are citing is rather old. At that time the current system has been High Sierra, and Photos has changed a lot since then.


The Photos.app is now much more ambitious and is doing a lot of background processing, scanning the library and analysing it with artificial intelligence. The size of the library matters now a lot more than several years ago.

It helps to keep the library small, but try to keep related photos, that you will need to use together, in one library.


My Photos Library is currently having a size of 360GB, with 67000 photos and 564 videos.

Photos is still sufficiently responsive when I am working with it, but after each major system upgrade Photos will be slow for a long time, while the library needs to be upgraded to the new system version and scanned again. This has been different in the older versions of Photos, that did not need to analyse the library for objects and scenes.

Some parts of the user interface are also not up to dealing with a very large library. The list of keywords is a flat list, that should be kept short, or it will take a long time to select a keyword, when defining smart albums based on keywords. The People and Pets album is also a flat album, and difficult to manage with more than atousand people in it.

When designing our libraries we should find a way to have all essential photos in our system photos library, because only the system Photos Library can sync with iCloud and is visible in the Media Browser for other applications, but archive photos, that are not necessary in the system photos library in additional archive libraries.



Feb 23, 2024 5:13 AM in response to léonie

Thank you for the very useful advice, léonie.

The keyword editor certainly seems to be lacking for such a sophisticated application.

I don't use iCloud for my photos, and there are not many people in them. I don't need Face ID or anything like that (or at least, I think I don't need it).

Hopefully, if I keep the libraries simple, it should be OK.

I need to find out more about archiving photos - there are thousands that I very rarely need.

Thanks again for your help!

This thread has been closed by the system or the community team. You may vote for any posts you find helpful, or search the Community for additional answers.

Multiple Photos Libraries - I'm favouring multiple

Welcome to Apple Support Community
A forum where Apple customers help each other with their products. Get started with your Apple Account.