Well here’s the thing, the studies I read that concerned me use a control group. The control group was not made up purely of sun deprived caveman, nor did researchers use a time machine to find pioneers to study in contrast to modern people.
Multiple modalities were employed in these kinds of research studies, and one example is comparing the instances a certain kinds of tumors to the side of the head that a person will hold their phone to during phone calls. By studying the side of the head that received more direct exposure, they were able to glean info despite the pervasive global factors like WiFi and “the sun”.
Maybe you will read this and then want to redirect your sarcastic remarks to the researchers. I’m just a regular person that’s trying to protect myself! If you were reasonable, I think you understand why a normal person (I.e., myself - hopefully) would be concerned after reading studies like this.
Why is it that that my merely feeling concerned - after reading concerning research - triggered you to reply in a haughty and unhelpful manner? Would you expect any reasonable person to feel any other way? Maybe your distain should be directed at the researchers or pub-med for publishing these studies, if you believe this is misinformation? No reason to be rude to me.
But since you have time to be rude to me, maybe you have time to scan and glance through the study below. Its not a single study but refers to meta analysis- here’s a quote followed by the link
“The most recent attempt to systematically review the epidemiologic evidence for increased risk of brain tumors related to cell phone use indicates that repercussions from this global experiment are coming to light. In a meta-analysis published in the May 2008 issue of the International Journal of Oncology, Swedish researchers found significant associations between long-term cell phone use and brain tumor risk.”
[Edited by Moderator]
