What is the best EMF reducing sticker or system/product?

More and more information is coming out about the harms of EMF coming from our phones. I found out that the iPhone 12 is actually banned in other countries because of how much radiation it puts out, and Apple has a warning not to sleep with your phone near you while it’s charging. It doesn’t say why it says it’s risk or dangerous but it doesn’t tell you what the risk or dangerous but it’s the fact that it’s microwaving you slowly at night


I do not understand why they don’t sell EMF reducing/protection stickers in the accessory areas of phone stores! Next to the phone cases. The one I’ve heard of is the one that the UFC just entered in a contract with to promote, but they’re like two or 300 per sticker


Does anyone have any information about what is the best way to reduce these frequencies? I don’t wanna get ripped off by company that doesn’t do it it promises.

iPhone 13, iOS 17

Posted on Nov 1, 2024 9:22 AM

Reply
Question marked as Top-ranking reply

Posted on Nov 1, 2024 2:01 PM

Excellent link from Zurarczurx,


>>Time to take off the tin foil hat: A review of 28 years of research into the health effects of radio wave exposure from cellphones has found no evidence to link the handhelds to brain cancer, or negative effects on health more generally.


The findings, published recently in Environment International and commissioned and partially funded by the World Health Organization (WHO), looked at 63 studies published between 1994 and 2022 from 22 countries.

Various types of brain and head cancers in adults and children, as well as whole-body exposure from proximity to broadcast antenna and base stations and occupational radio frequency/electromagnetic field (RF-EMF), were looked at as part of the meta-study. In no case did the researchers find a link between radio wave exposure from mobile and wireless devices and brain cancer. Note that RF-EMF is part of the non-ionizing radiation region of the electromagnetic spectrum, making it inherently and substantially less dangerous than ionizing radiation.<<


https://www.theregister.com/2024/09/04/who_study_cellphone_cancer/?td=rt-3a


WOW, just 2 months ago. This more realistically establishes facts and the innuendo and misleading posts can slowly fade away.

44 replies

Nov 17, 2024 1:27 PM in response to GreatAbz

Hi! Your question is valid. Since no one answered it, maybe this can help. Dr Rob DeMartino is the leading frequency doctor in the US. He has collaborated with others and they came up with 10 various EMF blockers. Out of the 10 they tested, one passed all of the tests. It is endorsed by him. Let me know if this helps or if you need further info.

Nov 18, 2024 8:28 AM in response to GreatAbz

All right, I think we’re all getting a little bit lost in the weeds here. Is the 2008 meta analysis study valid, or is it not? Is a chiropractor a “real enough” doctor, or is he not? I just want to simplify this conversation for everybody.


Radiation has to cause at least some kind of harm, it has to. If it didn’t, there wouldn’t be any minimum level of allowable radiation in France, therefore the iPhone 12 never would’ve been temporarily banned for exceeding it.

I’m sure that if we dug into the documents that were presented at the time when these countries set their minimal acceptable, radiation levels (there’s no way those levels were arbitrarily. They have to be based on research.) We would all accept that even if there isn’t enough data (yet) it’s common sense to assume that less radiation is better than more radiation. We didn’t evolve as humans being constantly surrounded by EMF frequencies.


Frequencies can be actually measured. Therefore, if there’s products that claim to mitigate the EMF frequencies that one is exposed to you, this should be a measurable outcome.


Crazy me, I just assumed that Tech people that I figure logical people would also assume that less EMF radiation has to be better than more, would assume that we don’t have a definitive answer yet onto how harmful it may or may not be, but it would be obvious to err on the side of caution. Therefore, if we can reduce, the frequencies were exposed to, we should.


I thank very much from the bottom of my heart the one person who responded to my question in straightforward way without being dismissive


I have one thing to throw out there. As regular consumers (as opposed to wealthy executives making money off of consumers) that we would all expect each other to ask questions like this. That we would all expect each other to be a little bit suspicious and we would all want to look out for one another.


I would think at this point that would be pretty clear that corporations don’t always have our best interest or health in mind. I think it’s pretty obvious, from days gone by, that employees who work for regulatory companies frequently take jobs for the same companies they “regulated” - there are lots of examples of outcomes of studies, being significantly sued in the favor of the company that funds the study. Or in the case of the recent study on the effects of transitioning children, if the outcome doesn’t support the narrative you were hoping for they just bury the study entirely and act like it never happened


get mad If you want, but we don’t live in a leave it to Beaver world right now. No further Covid to realize that “trust the science” Is a mantra that was designed to get us to shut up and stop asking questions. Even after the science keeps contradicting itself and changing constantly, if you ever question the status quo, you’re a bad person.


Meanwhile, all the pharmaceutical companies (and any other company that might be trying to harm us) are laughing all the way to the bank


I would get kind of pushback from an executive one of these companies, or even one of their employees. But this is a forum for regular people, for consumers.


It appears to me like over the years we’ve been conditioned to instantly attack, mock and dismiss fellow average folks like myself just for asking well meaning questions. I mean, just look at the general attitude and tone in the replies that I received - I didn’t put that dismissive vibe out in return. It’s almost like through mainstream media, you’ve all been conditioned like Pavlov’s dogs. The second you hear certain types of questions being asked, instantly snap into this haughty, mocking tone.


It’s like these corrupt wealthy companies have brainwashed you all into being their free, unpaid spokespeople! This doesn’t make any sense. Why would you feel distain for someone who is just asking questions? Don’t you understand that asking questions like these are in your best interest as well. But I’m asking for the sake of ALl of us?


And again! Why is there even a minimum level of acceptable radiation if it’s not capable of causing any harm?


Let’s not turn on each other, please. I am not the enemy.

Jan 2, 2025 9:33 AM in response to Lawrence Finch

Thank you for the wonderful reply, Lawrence! You are in fact, correct. If the power is on in your home, you're also getting some RF from the wires in your walls. But I was just trying to simplify things for folks. The entire intent of my post are tips for REDUCING one's exposure to RF energy, as I pointed out in the first line of my post, should they be so inclined to do so.


We get it... you don't think there's a danger with EMF/RF. That if one is afraid, that we should dig a hole 30' into the ground and live there, and disconnect ourselves from civilization all together.


Thanks for the input... it's very helpful!

This thread has been closed by the system or the community team. You may vote for any posts you find helpful, or search the Community for additional answers.

What is the best EMF reducing sticker or system/product?

Welcome to Apple Support Community
A forum where Apple customers help each other with their products. Get started with your Apple Account.