Looks like no one’s replied in a while. To start the conversation again, simply ask a new question.

Is it worth it to buy a mac mini? or imac instead?

Hi,


I will be as much brief as possible.


Im an audio engineer that has been used to work with Mac Pros, taking into account that in the studios I have worked, they got $60.000 consoles/mixers so it it is indispensable to have one of those.

At home ive got a Macbook Pro (late 2009) with 2.8 Ghz, 4GB RAm, 500Gb. I havent had any problems til now, except when Im using Logic Pro and Ive got a lot of plugins working a the same time. This happens every time in a while. Doesnt really affect my work. Im a DJ and I create electronic music.


I need a new computer as have acquired new equipment and Im out of USB ports and the screen is so small. Ive got two nice slim 22" LG MONITORS so that have helped. But I think is time to invest in a new desktop computer. I always need to move my laptop as its my only computer so its a pain in the *** to always plug and unplug everything.

If i buy a mac mini I will go for the 2.7 Ghz i7. that will cost $900. But the Imac with similar specifications will cost nearly $1500.00... theres ia 600 dolar difference. The only advante i see about the imac is its big screen. But I dont know if it is worth it to but the imac or macmini!!!!


Any help will be appreciated based on my needs.


thanks a lot

Macbook Pro, 2.8 GHz - 500Gb - 4Gb Ram

Posted on Aug 17, 2011 12:59 PM

Reply
Question marked as Best reply

Posted on Aug 17, 2011 5:52 PM

Some things to consider:

  • Do you need another monitor? That's mainly what the $600 difference buys you.
  • Are you going to need an optical drive? The mini doesn't come with one, so you'd need to hang an external one off of it.
  • Are you ever going to need to move this computer? With the mini, it's really easy to unplug everything, throw it in a bag and go. Not so much with the iMac.
  • One HUGE difference: the mini only comes with a dual-core CPU (even the i7). The iMac uses quad-cores across the board. If it were me, I think I'd choose more cores over less even though they had a slower clock speed.
26 replies

Oct 15, 2011 8:46 PM in response to mapex_venus

if you're talking about the difference between 5400RPM and 7200RPM, then you can see that the 7200 is 33% faster than the 5400. Of course, this won't translate into 33% better performance across the board, but one is definitely better performing than the other. I can't speak to how that looks in Logic, and like I tell everyone that asks, unless you have the two side-by-side, you won't notice the difference.


I would think that if the recording is going to FW, the plug-ins can't be that large as to impact performance when loading from the local hard drive. If you're buying from the Apple store, I'd suggest taking advantage of the two-week return policy.

Oct 16, 2011 9:43 AM in response to idAvIdce

I'm also trying to decide between Mini and iMac.


Another good point for the server Mini is two hard drives may be better for video edit work because you may be able to put the video input and output files on different drives. That would reduce the drive head movements for faster rendering. That was a standard trick the last time I did video edits a few years ago with Sony Vegas (originally made by Sonic Foundry). Possibly the same thing can be done with music work.


I suppose the two-drive advantage may not be as important these days with more RAM available to buffer the disk files.


Another point for the Mini in my situation is I have the computer in the same room as my TV which is usually on for monitoring news etc,even though I'm usually looking at the computer screen. Some monitors have several types of video and TV inputs so you can connect a set-top-box or cable feed, and use PIP or other monitor features, and leave the stand-alone TV turned off, to save power.

Oct 20, 2011 12:11 AM in response to adams7

For video editing as with audio editing, the most important configuration option (in my opinion) is to have a separate system drive (boot drive) where all the program files are stored and another hard drive (internal or external) where the digital audio/video files are located. It's nice to know that both the iMac and the Mac Mini offer this two-HD set-up as an optional customized enhancement. The (SSD's) Solid State Drives have no moving parts so they are quieter and cooler and faster and generally more reliable from what I've heard (ideal for a system/boot drive). Of course, it's probably worth mentioning they are priced higher than their louder hotter slower less-reliable counterparts. But despite the extra cost, the personalized Mac Mini hard drive option at The Apple Store that appeals to me the most is the one offering a primary 256 GB Solid State Drive + a secondary 750 GB Serial ATA Drive @ 7200 RPM.


As an interested observer of all Mac models, I've been watching the Mac Mini's evolve over the years and it is truly amazing to see how far they have advanced from a technological perspective from what they were years ago to what they are now. Heck, they even have something today that the 12-core Mac Pro's don't have yet namely a Thunderbolt port. This is particularly interesting since they are on opposite sides of the cost spectrum. And with a Thunderbolt Pegasus RAID system, you could achieve data transfer speeds that would make any HD video editor's head spin fast enough to require image stabilization. However, keep in mind that the Mac Mini server edition does NOT have a discrete graphics card even though the other Mac Mini models do. I'm sure it was just an overheating thing that was flagged by someone on Apple's team of enlightened engineers and there might even be a workaround for this apparent deficiency down the road when someone starts selling a Thunderbolt interface that turns the external addition of popular graphics cards via Thunderbolt from a wild dream into an even wilder reality! I predict that within a year (if not sooner), you'll be able to use PCI-slots with a Mac Mini because they will be part of these not-yet-invented Thunderbolt peripherals I'm talking about and that could open up a whole new world of Mac Mini possibilities.

Jul 26, 2012 8:49 AM in response to David Cun

Referring to my earlier post listed above of running Protools on the the 2011 mini server. That post is months old now. Protools 9.0.5 and 9.0.6 as well as any version of Protools 10 are all now compatible with lion 10.7.x. Protools IS compatible with lion server as well but will run smoother if you can get your lion server 5.3 (i7 quad) to run regular lion versus lion server. Protools is NOT compatible with Snow Leopard Sever 10.6.X as server application and utilities were integrated with the OS. Lion server 10.7.X is NOT integrated meaning that the server utilities and applications are treated like apps rather than integrated in the OS, meaning that they should theroetically not interfere with operation unless you install them or actiave them. However its been my experience that regular lion (non server) works better with protools.


Also the method I described for installing Snow Leopard on the 2011 mac mini preloaded with lion server does NOT work. The listed method only works on the 2010 mac mini snow leopard and converting it to client snow leopard.

Is it worth it to buy a mac mini? or imac instead?

Welcome to Apple Support Community
A forum where Apple customers help each other with their products. Get started with your Apple ID.