Want to highlight a helpful answer? Upvote!

Did someone help you, or did an answer or User Tip resolve your issue? Upvote by selecting the upvote arrow. Your feedback helps others! Learn more about when to upvote >

Looks like no one’s replied in a while. To start the conversation again, simply ask a new question.

Does anyone like Natural Scrolling

I have been going back and forth between natural scrolling and the original way. I use a magic trackpad with my iMac. Actuall I like the natural scrolling. After using this method for a bit, it actually makes sense and I have gotton use to it.


Anyone else using natural scrolling?

iMac, Mac OS X (10.7.1)

Posted on Aug 27, 2011 5:43 AM

Reply
79 replies

Oct 8, 2011 7:26 AM in response to Chip Old

Thanks for your answer; as I said it was a genuine question, and I'd thought the 'apple spiel' remark (which seems to have sent a couple of people off into a bizarre spin), was clearly indicated as a light hearted jest by the deliberate inclusion of the 'silly' smiley: 😝 .


I don't dispute anyone's right to use their machine any way that suits them (why would I?) — I just wanted to know if I was missing out on something by not unlearning the way I've been doing it for years. I don't believe I am from your explanation, but I thank you for it.


Regards


Sw 🙂


(and as for you other guys talking about religion, conspiracies, dark empires....really, you need to chill out a bit, i'm still at a loss at where you were coming from!).

Oct 8, 2011 7:25 AM in response to ChristianAWinter

ChristianAWinter wrote:


I can't believe the discussion thread though. People infuse their comments and replies with religion and conspiracy theories instead of just having a clean technical discussion.

Not surprising. The OP's question doesn't lend itself to a technical discussion. It's all about personal preference, which is almost completely subjective.


And for the record, I took Softwater's "You've just been suckered into the Apple spiel..." as tongue in cheek, and my "conspiracy theory" response was in kind.

Oct 25, 2011 3:06 AM in response to igmackenzie

igmackenzie wrote:


Not at all. If you think of the 'map on the table' analogy, it's perfectly natural


If you think of hanging upside down like a bat, then anti-gravity is perfectly natural too. The point is whether the analogy is apt or not.



the 'new' way of scrolling.


Why 'new' ? It's new. Nothing metaphorical about that. It's also a pointless change for change's sake.

Oct 25, 2011 3:25 AM in response to igmackenzie

igmackenzie wrote:


'New' to OS X. It's been happening in the real world since time immemorial!


Oh, please, no need to spare us your blushes. Next you're going to tell us 'scrolling' on a computer screen has something to do with 'scrolls' as in ancient documents...


'Scrolling' is a technical term in computer parlance that hasn't been around since "time immemorial"; it means the way you navigate a document or page that is larger than the screen. It has always and only been done one way until iOS.


I agree, with a touch screen, it is different. But as I said earlier in this thread (or maybe another one... ), the difference is in the navigational device — i.e., the cursor — and has nothing to do with whether you use a trackpad or a mouse. Your finger is the cursor (so to speak) in iOS. In OS X it isn't and that's what makes it unnatural.

Oct 25, 2011 3:32 AM in response to igmackenzie

Here my 2 cents,

The "old" way: You are looking through a window at some content, when you scroll down, you are actually moving the window down so the content moves up.

The "new" way: You are directly moving the content and not the window to it.


WIMP had us all confused. It took me a while and now I quite like it.

Does anyone like Natural Scrolling

Welcome to Apple Support Community
A forum where Apple customers help each other with their products. Get started with your Apple ID.