Tom Gewecke wrote:
You are certainly entitled to your views on that.
Yeah, ain't democracy great?
But I think it is inappropriate to criticize others who may want to be more helpful to a broader range of users than you do by using terms like alt instead of option.
Once again, I beg to differ.
First of all, I am constitutionally opposed to the idea that anyone or anything is beyond criticism.
Second, I think that the best and kindest help given to novices and switchers is to teach them as quickly as possible the ways and customs of the Mac, not to perpetuate ideas and habits acquired elsewhere; just as it behooves them to try to learn the Mac way of doing things. And I speak as someone who not only was a novice himself once, but also as someone who uses both Macs and Windows. In fact, back home, my SOHO consists of 4 PCs and 2 Macs (I'm not counting my old Mac Classic, which I still have, but, sadly, is not working any more. I keep promising myself that, some time soon, when I have time, I'm gonna get myself a long Torx screwdriver and crack open the case to see if I can fix it.)
Third, in this specific instance, I would criticise someone who called the ⌥ key "Alt" even if it were a mere matter of label, because labels do matter. But it's not. On Windows, the Alt modifier can function as a command key (alt-F4 anyone?); on Mac, ⌥, although it can be a modifier of the Command key, is never a command key itself; being, in this respect, similar to AltGr, not Alt. Indeed, it is instructive to check various entries in FOLDOC -- in one, the ⌘ (Command) key is given as the Mac equivalent of Alt, while another states that ⌘ is equivalent to Control (which early Mac keyboards lacked) and ⌥ to Alt. What this demonstrates is that there is no simple Option = Alt equivalence. Alt is Alt and ⌥ is Option and the twain shall meet only when using non-Mac stuff on Macs.