Don Trammell wrote:
Lightroom has had many more upgrades than Aperture and is simply currently not as good.
So, Aperture is still better, right?
LR has many features that Apertures have been screaming and begging for so your "opinion" that the pro world does not want frequent upgrades is spurious.
Aperture is not perfect, I agree. There are some things I have to apply to an image in another program or with a plug-in. Lens distortion, for example... But that doesn't mean that I want frequent updates. Every update contains the risk that something goes wrong, resulting in a loss of time for fixing the problem (downgrading to the previous, working, version, for example).
We want upgrades that matter, save time, and provide a more efficent workflow.
That's absolutely correct! But what has this to do with the frequency of upgrades? For me it is absolute ok to wait a while for a bigger upgrade if the result is a version that is really functional and doesn't make things worse. Implementing lots of (new) bugs causing Library confilcts or frequent crashes etc. doesn't save any time.
Right now, no matter how you want to spin this, Aperture is about a year behing Lightroom.
Above, you said that Lightroom is currently not as good as Aperture, if I was getting it right. So, if Aperture is still a year behind Lightroom and even better, what will Aperture 4 be if it is released next year (maybe)?
I guess every program has its pro's and con's and implies the need of a special - mostly improvable - workflow. If you like to switch to Lightroom - where is the problem? You can start using it, whenever you want. Leave your old libraries in Aperture and create any new ones in Lightroom. In a few years you won't touch your old photos any more and you can remove Aperture from your system, if you like. I recommend to export the processed images before, as 100% jpgs or tiffs if you think you might need the extra quality. You can archive your RAWs in a different location and re-process single files again in Ligthroom, if you feel the urge of doing so. What do you think?
Edit: ok, you were faster... :-)