Sorry for the delay, but I rellay couldn't be bothered to answer your goal-post moving comments.
You stated: "Well I would disagree about the rumour mills, and perhaps you missed the stuff about Aperture 4 books on Amazon. You're perfectly entitled to your opinion (or OPINION - what's the difference?) but if you're going to spread FUD with no evidence, don't be surprised if someone provides actual reasonable alternative explanations."
My reply: You brought up Amazon as a potential source to prove that Aperture 4 is a reality. Not me. So your source is no better than mine and you now a member of the FUD universe along with me. When guys like John Gruber, Gene Munster, and a few other highly respected Apple evangelists (apologists), etc... are quiet about an Apple product maybe it could mean that Apple has no intention to support it any longer. Considering that Aperture is not a cash cow, and we all know that Apple is all about making money first and foremost, not necessarily listening to their user base, it could simply be that they no longer feel that Aperture is worth the effort. Who knows? Maybe you do as you seem to know everything...
As it stands, Aperture is lacking in many feautres in regards to Lightroom. It is simply a fact. Like it or not, that is just the way it is. Will Apple respond? No one knows, except maybe you of course.
@espen vestre,
Nikon's Capture NX is the best RAW processing engine I have ever used for NEF files... Better than Aperture and Lightroom with processing RAW's from Nikon cameras...
@niko.n,
I am not speaking in regards to what software is perfect or not. I am talking about Apple not keeping up with features that have been requested and answered by the competition. This too is a fact...