Looks like no one’s replied in a while. To start the conversation again, simply ask a new question.

iCloud and iDisk Why????

I purchased a mobile me account quite some time ago. The reason for this was primarily for the functionality of iDisk. I share a lot of files with my customers and iDisk was a solid solution to this. I just upgraded to iCloud from Mobile Me and realized that after June 2012 I will no longer be able to share those files like I did with iDisk. I have read through all of the discussions regarding sharing files and this really frustrates me!


APPLE - BRING BACK iDisk!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! OR FIGURE OUT A WAY TO INTEGRATE IT INTO iCloud. If you read through your discussions on this topic you will see that you will probably loose a lot of customers due to this change. This includes myself.

MacBook Pro, Mac OS X (10.7.3), Several other Macs too...

Posted on Feb 29, 2012 9:36 AM

Reply
44 replies

Apr 29, 2012 6:20 PM in response to BklynGibby

BklynGibby wrote:


I don't use MobileMe and iDisk to back up my data. I use 3 different computers in three separate locations, one being my laptop on the road. I have a number of documents I open daily and use iDisk so I can keep the most current file for use from which ever computer I am at at the moment. iDisk ws a great thing for me.

Tou can do the samethingg with SugarSync, free up to 5G

May 1, 2012 2:44 AM in response to beandesign333

As a result of this STUPID and RETROGRADE update I have had to buy a new Mac G5 desktop, Re write my Website for the third time as a result of them ditching, homepage, mobile me and Iweb - I have also got to learn a whole new web design package as a result (Business User) and have had to buy over £2000.00 of new software and my business is staring down the barrel of bancruptcy because of the debt burden this has placed on my small business in the teeth of a recession: All because some Californian MIT graduates think its Cool for teenagers to sync pictures and facebook accounts over their multiple Ipads & Ipods.


THIS IS INSANE! and nobody ....I mean nobody can explain to me why Apple are doing this - I mean is there some great reason in the pipeline (I doubt it).


I live in East Lothian in Scotland and all the primary Schools used to use Macs but as a result of lamentable support they swiched to PC.


This is as a result of this push on regardless mentality. Think of all the jobs that could be created if legacy machines were still supported.


I bought my first Apples for email & photos - guess what they still do what I bought them for. I have a G3 connected to a £ 2000.00 Linotype Scanner running on OS 9 - it still does what it is supposed to.


I think it is mad that all this redundant hardware is going into landfill when it could be given to schools in Africa.


I do not see why Apple cannot take a more holistic approach to the whole thing - I am so Cheesed off with them I cannot begin to articulate my contempt. ********************

Jed

May 1, 2012 5:44 AM in response to Csound1

By new G5 Desktop read G5 Mac Pro as I am an old geezer I still refer to a Computer "Tower" as a desktop model to distinguish it from say a laptop or imac - as you get older you tend to see pedantry over technical nitpicking as - sooooooo last year! - I think you youngsers might say - J


By the way don't get me wrong I am as much an Apple evangelist as the next person, however they miss the oppertunity to mop the floor with PC's by being too elitist in their approach and I am in real financial dire straights as a result of Apple flip flopping from one bright idea to the next with no continuity of sofware content. Adobe wouldn't dream of doing this say to photoshop in a million years because their clients are, photographers & designers like myself and we like Evolution not reinvention.

May 1, 2012 6:33 AM in response to Jedgor

I appreciate your pain... However, the new features supported by Apple require a bit more grunt than the old PowerPC-driven Macs can deliver, and the code base is optimised for Intel these days... I am not sure why you didn't continue to run your legacy software on your older Mac - as you say, they continue to run well for years... And there are plenty of low-cost, even free, web-design software packages that would give you most of what iWeb gave you (which was not much really...).


As for kids and photos and ipods, well, I am an old-timer too and I have grumbled about the same thing... However, Apple's market is iPhone and iPad these days, and support for the new features which integrate these devices into the Mac environment requires new functionality, and more grunt - so older Macs fall by the wayside. (**** expletive deleted), even my old iPhone 3G is not really supported these days, though it can be made to work with iCloud for most things (except Safari tabs I understand).


iDisk is apparently re-appearing under a different name in Mountain Lion, according to a web article on Computerworld's website that I read yesterday.


Technology has always moved at a scary pace - I was in the industry for over 30 years and the computers I cut my teeth on have been superseded more times than I care to think about... Apple is, of course, not alone in this. You can't run Windows 7 on an old PC either...


I guess you don't mean G5 Mac Pro either... The G5 was a PowerPC processor and was last made about 5 years ago. If you bought a desktop I am guessing you have an iMac, if its all in one piece - the Mac Pro has always been expensive and you generally only need this sort of power if you are doing film or something equally demanding...


And while technology marches on, it also gets cheaper. More bang for your buck... You've had a good run with your G5 and an even better run with your G3... And you'll undoubtedly get a good run out of your new Mac - a Mac has always been a better investment than a PC...


So cheer up, and enjoy your new stuff. You'll get over the frustration of the forced upgrade... ...until the next time, perhaps in 2020!


And say hello to East Lothian for me. I have lots of family from there generations ago, and I was in Edinburgh in 2011 and 2010...

May 1, 2012 9:24 AM in response to Julian Wright

I don't have any Apple mobile devices, so it seems that the iCloud is really not very helpful to me.


I can't do backups, I can't use Pages, even though I keep getting emails from Apple telling me to move to the cloud because iWork.com is ending. It's all really very confusing. This transition is not smooth.


There is no consistency and it seems that once people get settled into using a service, they radically change it, causing upheaval and havoc. I'm tired of these constant changes. I'm glad I'm not paying for this.


I am using SugarSync for my iDisk replacement.

May 1, 2012 3:43 PM in response to dsc207

Mountain Lion is apparently adding support that lets you sync Mac iWork files with iCloud. Still no drive, but at least once this update is released we can finally edit documents we make in iWork for Mac on iWork for iOS. I agree that there is no consistency... i mean Mac's sync uploaded docs to iwork.com(or used to) and iOS syncs with iCloud. They have redundent services, and should consolidate them. They are synchronizing documents, but they take out features like iDrive which should stay. Not the best management, nor is it easy for consumers. Both of which go against Apple's attempted reputation.

May 2, 2012 1:45 AM in response to Csound1

Aaaaaaaaaah now I get it.....sorry banged to rights guvnor for G5 Mac Pro read just Mac Pro - I am so used to looking at the silver tower under the desk I forgot - you tend to forget things like that when you are going senile & venting your spleen.



By the way I would just like to say a big thanks to all the users who replied to my post - Taa Jed

May 2, 2012 4:51 AM in response to Jedgor

You'd be surprised at the what the new MiniMacs are capable of. I use them as servers in my office. They have dual core chips and they are deceivingly small considering the computing power they possess. Unless the software you run requires the quad core CPUs buy the less expensive Mini rather than the "tower".

You can see from my earlier posts, I am just as disappointed as you in Apple's decision to drop iDisk. It sends a message to consumers - watch out, be ready to be wrangled into a new product and loose support for the old. It makes you think, hmm should I buy it in the first place and purchase a similar product elsewhere to begin with.

Mark

May 2, 2012 9:08 AM in response to ByronBound

I'm a movie composer and have this past 25 years embraced the incredible technology that Apple has developed as a mainstay of what's become our tools of the trade. I believe in return, along with many professional compatriots, I've helped Apple become the amazing success it is with both our input to its R & D and a "hip" association with the music and film business. It's been an incredibly exciting time.


I'm terribly sad to be losing the iDisk ...... simply as it's been a great way for my less technical clients to follow my work as it progresses on their projects. Via a link to a web browser they've accessed my Public folder (often on their PCs!) to pick up Quicktime Movies and music mixes from all over the world, at all stages of movie production. It's also a permanent access to my soundtrack albums and movie showreels for prospective clients.


Have I missed something or is there actually no replacement for this once iDisk has been dumped?


This move does seem to add to the general fear that's widespread amongst amongst colleagues, that as Apple's fortune has grown (partly on the back of the pro's cool chic) ...... the cult of the amateur seems to be fast replacing what we all saw as our special hallowed ground as the avant garde.


For example, successful movie editors, many of who were on the verge of taking up Final Cut Pro, (as was state of development around 2005/6) have gone back to AVID on a PC, simply because FCP never quite fulfilled it's potential. ie. the reliable work horse it almost became. In fact FCPX was a huge disappointment for most of the professional editors I know who talked about it being a "more amateur style app"


The Mac Pro, - back bone of the media professional's intensive processing arsenal seems to have been worryingly neglected in the race for Apple to dominate the fast growing iOS market. We're all understandably starting to feel insecure about the attention from Apple's R & D dept that we once had, fast evaporating.


Financially it makes absolute sense for Apple to move away from the production base of the once rich film and music industries, because indeed all the wealth is evaporating from anything creative that is digitally copyable!


It does make me feel rather sad that this could be the end of a balanced symbiosis between these entities. Apple makes vast fortunes through the music and movies it distributes via iTunes, but seems to be withdrawing its support from professional production technologies it once encouraged.


However there are still glimmers of hope. Movie composers like myself who spent £20,000 - 30,000 on Emagic Logic software with Digidesign Protools Hardware in the 90's, continue to use Logic which continues to be supported by Apple. It's one heck of a totally amazing piece of software design that's gone from strength to strength ....... long may this be the case!


I wonder if the loss of idisk is a nail in the professional Apple user's coffin or a wee change in our ongoing life cycle that will be seen to have some eventual occupational benefit?


Best

Dick

iCloud and iDisk Why????

Welcome to Apple Support Community
A forum where Apple customers help each other with their products. Get started with your Apple ID.