Anybody using the StudioPro 3 monitors?

A review of these monitors sounded too good to be true? (Especially for the price.) Anyone using these?
M-AUDIO - StudioPro 3 - Professional Desktop Audio Monitors

Kurt

iMac 500 mhz, 9.2.2; iBook G4;, Mac OS X (10.3.9), Firewire ext. HD

Posted on Mar 10, 2006 12:48 PM

Reply
77 replies

May 21, 2006 7:29 PM in response to MyApple8MyPC

I started a new post dealing with the bass problem. I don't think the sub is giving me the problems. With the sub at the lowest volume I still hear too much bass.

I get less bass problems moving the smaller speakers forward but experience listening fatigue with the speakers as close to me as I need them to be. I tried using my Behringer mixer to roll off some of the bass and high end. This seems to be giving me good results which suggests that these speakers are colored somewhat or reacting strongly to my room. The separation and clarity of the speakers and lack of distortion at high levels makes me want to keep messing with this set up.

Radio Shack has an inexpensive sound level meter. Is it worth getting?

Kurt

May 21, 2006 10:54 PM in response to isteveus

I tried a bunch of computer speakers and never found any that didn't color the sound.


This is a great article that has helped me understand the problem:
All About Home and Project Studio Monitors

Basically, every monitor colors the sound. If the sound is too flat you tend to overemphasize the missing frequency. This is not desirable either. (Read the humorous story about the origin of the disco smile.) The speakers recommended to me here got some negative and positive reviews. Quite a few people mentioned using them to monitor.

My first impressions so far:
Bass is too boomy wherever the speakers are placed (might be because of my room). Highs and mids are excellent. In iTunes I turn the EQ off and the song is evenly mixed (with the exception of the bass). Add the iTunes EQ, set it for the style of music, and the song pops out with crystal clear vocals and excellent stereo imaging. I appreciate the accuracy when listening to my eclectic iTunes library. All styles of music sound great on these speakers.

These speakers have power. Cranking up the volume gives no distortion and powerful sound.

At the worst, these speakers will be loads of fun for normal listening. If they don't work out at the office I am thinking of bring them home to use with my DVD player. At the best, I will get the EQ and room to cooperate and have an excellent set of monitors.

Kurt

May 22, 2006 12:30 AM in response to Kurt Weber

"I get less bass problems moving the smaller speakers forward but experience listening fatigue with the speakers as close to me as I need them to be. "
I didn't find your other post but it sounds like you're having problems with the lower midrange. Without putting a meter on your room and running some tests there is no way that anyone will be able to tell you exactly what your problem is. At best all we would be able to do is to get you in the right ballpark. There are simply too many variables involved. What the radioshack meter will be able to do for you is to keep your ears honest. The meter won't lie but your ears can be fooled ( actually very easily). I would find a good software based mutiband EQ and tweak it to your room. You'll be tempted to readjust the EQ after a few days goes by but don't, let your ears readjust to the meter, instead of the other way around.

May 22, 2006 12:50 AM in response to isteveus

" I finally bought some studio monitors and will never buy any computer speaker again."
There is no such thing as a perfect speaker/monitor because there is no such thing as a perfect room to play them in. They both effect the other. And even if you spent millions to custom create a custom monitor to a specific room, you'd still need a perect set of ears to hear them with, and that doesn't exist either. No doubt your monitors probably cost a bit more than most 'computer speakers' too, which also needs to be entered into the equation. just because the word 'monitor' is associated with a product does not inherently make them better, although their advertising company probably would love for you to think so. Unfortunately for the advertising companies, sound properties simply doesn't work that way. Whether they're speakers or two tin cans connected with string, or a pair of over priced monitors, they are all bound by the same laws of acoustics.

May 22, 2006 7:08 PM in response to Brian jeffery

If you are asking for priority you need to get the equipment to enter your music into the machine first. You can always come back later and mix.

How are you using Garageband? I am a keyboard player, so a MIDI keyboard is a must to use all the cool software instruments. Mikes and a mixer are necessary. You can get an analogue or USB mixer.

BTW, You might want to start this as a new question. This thread is quite long.

Kurt

May 25, 2006 5:13 PM in response to MyApple8MyPC

I am having pretty good luck with the speakers, routed and roughly EQ'd through my inexpensive mixer and adjusted using the pink noise files and the Radio Shack decibel meter. The sound is now more evenly spread across the frequencies and I keep the decibels of the overall mix to a respectable level, with less listening fatigue.

Bass and mids are still the hardest to mix, not because of these speakers but because of most other speakers. People are often listening to mixes on cheap car stereos or boom boxes with small speakers. Trying to get the mix to sound decent on every set up is quite a challenge.

Kurt

This thread has been closed by the system or the community team. You may vote for any posts you find helpful, or search the Community for additional answers.

Anybody using the StudioPro 3 monitors?

Welcome to Apple Support Community
A forum where Apple customers help each other with their products. Get started with your Apple Account.