rrahimi wrote:
If balancing price and performance, it's a very good config. 2.3 --> 2.6 is big enough of an improvement to justify the cost. 2.7 not so much.
Memory maxed out, pretty much a requirement, specially if running demaning applications, in my case virtualization.
And while 256 is not all that much, the upgrade to 500 is too expensive. My plan is to wait for SSD prices to drop further and then replace it with a 500+ in a year or two. OWC already has upgrades available, albeit more so expensive than the native configurations.
I'm pleasantly surprised that Apple is letting you pick the lower-end model and then upgrading all of the components to what is available in the higher-end model. Really lets you get the exact config you want without paying for more than you want (very unlike Apple, but it's a change for the good as far as I'm concerned).
I completely agree that the max RAM (+$200) is almost a must if you'll be doing any VMs since you can't add it later, but it might be overkill for the typical user (but then again, is anyone that buys a rMBP a "typical" user??). Given the overall price of the computer, it seemed like it was worth getting than having regrets later.
The 2.3 -> 2.6 GHz CPU upgrade also provides some good bang for the $'s (only +$100)
For me, the 500GB flash drive was pretty much a requirement because I also use a VM's as well as BootCamp (for max performance on games and other Windows apps where speed matters). I know that I'd hit the storage wall almost immediately with 256GB of storage so I had to pay for that upgrade.
The 756GB flash drive is just crazy at +$500 from the 512GB drive. I'll buy an external flash drive before I do that upgrade.