I won't really bother with Ultraviolet since I can't get movies that are even SD quality for play on my mac or appleTV or ipad.
I wouldn't say Ultraviolet does a better job of providing how people want to use content since I can't get HDX with the hardware I have. Like itunes and apple. Ultraviolet tightly regulates how you use your content. I think they require internet access to get to your content in general. Not sure if even downloaded stuff will play without verification. This is not the case I believe with iTunes purchased movies. I can play movies I download without being linked to the internet.
Vudu told me I would need to invest in a new Vudu ready TV or get a Roku.
Nice idea, but I should be able to use the Vudu app on my Mac and get better than SD.
Since they won't do that for mac's I am in a bit of a bind as far as Ultraviolet digital copies are concerned.
Why do they cripple Apple devices copies? Why not have the full HDX working on Apple devices?
That is how they lost my business. I purchased a lot of movies, but had to cancel the deal since I didn't get what I was paying for. If they had the quality they promised, then I would have gradually replaced all 400 of my DVD's. Now they get nothing.
RE: second off topic comment by Jim R...
I think that Apple could do themselves a service of having groups of family accounts that are controlled with one master account. That way everyones content could purchased separately on an individual basis, but managed ultimately by the master account. The master account could manage privileges, funding options, access options of each account. The master would own the content, but other users could add to master content.
The master could determine how the content is distributed and would have priviledge to access all of it or distribute all of it to devices of any sub accounts.
Likely Apple has thought of this or is working to such a system. I imagine licensing is a giant sticking point.