ubernaut wrote:
i think this is actually more akin to what they did with iDVD at least with iDVD the technology had almost died, RSS is still heavily used throughout the net
No one is disputing the fact that RSS is widely available. RSS is still something of a power-user tool. In that respect, it is similar to iDVD. With RSS feeds, there are technical complications getting the old method working in Mountain Lion. With iDVD, the next technology was Blu-Ray, which Apple skipped due to licensing issues, prefering to put all of their efforts into iTunes over the web and AppleTV. Apple may be trying to do the same with HTML5's notifications, although that is still in early infancy.
im not sure if you are getting what i have tried to explain several times now the whole thing that makes it better is not having to toggle back and forth between two different apps.
Yes. I realize that. It is convenient for users who prefer to have RSS in Safari. But it is impossible to sell a Safari Plug-in through the Mac App Store. You can't sell a Safari extension at all because it is just source code. I spent about 5 months (working part-time) building EtreFeed. That is a lot of effort to ask someone to do for free.
i was actually refrring to apple at large. fact is im probably not going to go anywhere tomorrow but the point is that apple has always been the best alternative but if they continue down the path of sacrificing power user features they will just be the same crap as every other pc maker at some point. i have no idea what you mean by that last sentence.
I was referring to stand-alone RSS readers and/or Google Reader. Apple doesn't compete in areas where it can't disrupt and dominate. If there is a technical barrier for an Apple solution that is just an also-ran, Apple will drop it.
that sounds awesome! regarding the pubsub thing and sandboxing and some new feature for 10.8.x that seems like alot of speculation id still say that if they havent made many changes since 2007 and it still works as well as it does 5 years later it says to me that the feature didnt really require much maintenence. in fact i have one anecdotal example of how apple never really had to much work in this regard:
craigslist, for about a 2 year period their feeds were not compatible with safari. i kept hoping a new update would come out for sfari that restore them but it never happened then one day they magically started workign again. both happened due to changes craigslist made due to user complaint apple obviously never gave a rats *** about it. the integrated rss functionality was always a difining and distinguishing feature if you renable the functionality through a plugin i'd expect a lot of fans for your efforts at least.
My interest in this is to find a way to sell apps through the Mac App Store and then release free add-ons that would otherwise be incompatible with Mac App Store policies and have those add-ons require the Mac App Store product. I'm not sure if it is possible.