I agree with AC. Perhaps a little HDMI background is needed to understand. HDMI is not as simple as most people seem to think it is. To the end user you just flick a switch, or plug something in and the magic “just happens” but what’s behind that magic is much more complicated than you can imagine. That’s why the technology wasn’t here sooner.
All HDMI is not the same. There are many versions of HDMI; including versions 1.0, 1.1, 1.2, 1.2a, 1.3, 1.3a, 1.3b, 1.3c, 1.4, 1.4a and soon 2.0 and each of these need to work with each other and yet contains its own set of features like HDMI Ethernet Channel, Audio Return Channel (ARC), 4Kx2K Resolution Support, 3D Over HDMI, even Automotive Connection System. There are 19 separate connectors such as DDC/CEC/HEC Ground, TMDS Data2+, and SCL (PC Serial Clock for DDC) to name just a few. Starting to sound technical? It should because it is. That's the point. Any kind of problem with any of these signals and HDMI simply stops working. You can begin to see how HDMI quickly becomes a soup of technologies that have to all get along and work perfectly with each other or there will quickly be problems. Thankfully most of the time it does work fine, and this gives consumers the false illusion that it’s a simple technology, but the fact is that intermixing manufactures increases the odds of HDMI problems happening.
I’m not trying to make excuses for Apple, but instead just trying to get some here to understand that HDMI is much more complicated than a simple wall outlet where you just plug something in and it magically works. Add to this mix the common misconception that HDMI cables carry digital data in the form of a stream of 0s and 1s, so it must be easy for them to function flawlessly all the time, regardless of cost of the cables or construction. In fact as stated when you mix-and-match HDMI source devices, cables, displays, accessories, etc, from many different manufacturers, it's almost a certainty that you'll run into trouble. Add to this soup of technologies the fact that there are many versions of DisplayPort that have to get along with HDMI, and you can see that problems with HDMI is not just black and white as some think. Just because a product passes HDMI compliance testing doesn’t mean what you think it means, because a high percentage of displays, cables, and devices are usually at the lower end of the performance scale. With HDMI your video signal could be absolutley perfect but if the DDC line has any rise-time issues, the unit simply will not pass HDCP(High-bandwidth Digital Content Protection) and when HDCP has issues of any kind - no picture will be produced. This is why Apple has been consistently asking people to send them captured data, so that they can find a common link to this issue and have a starting point to resolve it.
Yes everyone knows this issue is an annoying problem. Yes Apple is working on it. Yes people are frustrated. Yes the developers are working on the seeded 10.8.3. Realistically this all takes time to sort out. If anyone isn’t comfortable with waiting for this matter to get resolved, then you should probably just return your mini. Eventually this will get resolved and they can decide what’s best for them at that time. Apples biggest mistake IMHO is deciding to use the Intel HD4000, but guess what? Its been written about that Apple is now in talks to have Intel produce all of their chips (even for the iPad) so this matter with Apple products could go downhill fast. Why Apple thinks that Intel is Casanova I couldn't tell you. Hopefully what has happened to the mini and other Macs with all these HDMI issues will be a wakeup call for them. Please Apple, at least give your customers the option to use something else other than Intel graphics. Let your customers vote with their wallet (just like they do with other options like the Fusion drive) and you'll soon see that they'd rather pay for non-Intel graphics. If you don't offer customers that option then they may be forced to vote with their wallets by staying away from your products altogeter, and nobody wants that.