That's like saying a lemon is the same as an orange as long as you paint it yellow. Makes sense to me...
What we are saying is that Apple has changed - big time. At one time they offered solid software that worked in the way we wanted it to work, at a reasonable price. They garnered a user-base because of that. They then drop the ball (perhaps "throw the ball away" would be a better analogy, e.g. iWeb, iWork) indicating they do not take responsibility for the thing they created, nor are they accountable to their user-base for what that user-base has created using Apple's products.
In selecting software, budget is a factor. When looking for equivalency, current budget is a factor. To say something is equivalent, but only at additional cost, makes your "equivalency" invalid. That's like saying I can replace my Volkswagen with a Mercedes Benz.
I have iWeb and I have independent hosting for $25/year. I'm looking for an equivalent to the first part of that statement (I.e. iWeb). I may not find it...I haven't yet.