I agree. Apple needs to address this directly, instead of via (not so) clandestine overnight editing at the end of a week. I expect more out of Apple.
What's starting to settle in with me is that the AW still has promise as a wrist-worn computer, but is a half-baked, not ready for primetime fitness tracker.
I don't know what I'm going to do now that this news has broken. The idea of having $500 back in my pocket is tempting. Never thought I'd seriously consider returning an Apple product. I'm torn, like others, because I love the computer functionality yet the fitness stuff hasn't lived up to expectations, even reasonable expectations that factored in early adopter bugs/growing pains.
I'm sending the 9-to-5 Mac story to blogs.
Mamoru16 wrote:
This is infuriating. So the functionality is now best to monitor someone who is in a coma and just doesn't move. Again, I don't care that my heart rate is great when I'm sitting around not doing anything. It's when I'm up and moving around that matters to me. I understand that I can turn on one of the exercise functions to get more frequent measurements, but that is annoying and unnecessary. That in itself would be a battery drain. For instance, if I'm out on the town for an evening, I'm going to be more active and it would make sense to take hr measurements every 10 minutes instead of multiple times a minute. That slight altering of the support document is insulting to early adopters and misleading from the entire marketing campaign that sold us on the watch. I'm pretty sure one of the videos I watched from the press conference or the watch app also mentioned taking the measurements every 10 minutes.
I have no problems being an early adopter and dealing with bugs, but slight-of-hand "here's a core feature… now it's gone, but that's how it's supposed to function" is not ok.