iPhone 6 fingerprint error 53

mendonipadrehab wrote:

Whoa--lets talk about citing sources. Where did you get this?

"You believe that Apple is fighting against unauthorized repairs because of 'potential loss of revenue from repair service'."

Umm... seriously? You're joking, right?

mendonipadrehab wrote:

Where there are millions or billions of dollars going to independent repair is not really an important distinction. If they weren't concerned about the potential impact they wouldn't bother to send lobbyists to visit legislators considering a right to repair bill.

Apple wants the easy dollars for easy repair that requires little training, no troubleshooting time.

I never said you posted people's personal information, and I never claimed to be a fan of rules myself. I'm not much for conventional norms, but I am up front. When I was initially banned after a few hours on the first night I came here, of course I made a second Apple ID even though the rules say "don't you do that." and posted as Love_Repair, but you guys are smart enough to have seen that a mile away. I'm also totally transparent, and take responsibility for any non-rule following consequences.

But YOU are (apparently) a rule follower, and you like to trot out the rules and point to the section on personal information and claim that I'm violating it----I'm not. No submissions of mine include a link to me.

So if YOU want to trot out the rules, then constantly violate them with posts that are not technical answers, it just makes me smile.

mendonipadrehab wrote:

I never said you posted people's personal information, and I never claimed to be a fan of rules myself. I'm not much for conventional norms, but I am up front. When I was initially banned after a few hours on the first night I came here, of course I made a second Apple ID even though the rules say "don't you do that." and posted as Love_Repair, but you guys are smart enough to have seen that a mile away. I'm also totally transparent, and take responsibility for any non-rule following consequences.

But YOU are (apparently) a rule follower, and you like to trot out the rules and point to the section on personal information and claim that I'm violating it----I'm not. No submissions of mine include a link to me.

So if YOU want to trot out the rules, then constantly violate them with posts that are not technical answers, it just makes me smile.

Show me where my initial post in a thread was not addressing a technical question or was addressing a point made by another person. Once the seal has been broken by someone else, yes, I feel justified in following the progression of the thread. But I don't start the submission that goes off 'technical points' or addresses the rules or requirements of this forum.

Your profile is a submission by you. That includes personal information. I can play semantics all day, ma'am, and I'm better at it than you.