Thanks. This raises another question then. If FIleVault is supposed to be more secure than without it, but both can be intruded into using the same password, what is the advantage of the encryption? I'm trying to foresee a bad situation: you lose your Mac, someone pries into it (how? hacking your password?). Once they've figured that out, what stops them from unvaulting the MacBook; worse, why would they need to if they are already inside?
Wouldn't having a dedicated password for FireVault be the obvious answer? But then, if your login can be hacked, what's to prevent your FV password from being hacked? I guess the idea is that the latter exists in encrypted form on the drive, while the former is stored in unencrypted form on the drive. If that's right, you really need 2 passwords. Or not?
Or do you mean that there's a FV recovery key separate from your login? And the only way to decrypt the vault is with the recovery key? That would make more sense. But not complete sense. If the only reason you have a recovery key is to (just beginning to explore this security enhancement.)