Forced use of 64-bit applications

Anyone understand why we will not be able to run 32-bit software under future versions of the OS? I mean, I know 64-bit software is superior, but what if a 64-bit version of something we rely on heavily does not exist and will never exist? Specifically, perhaps my most valuable application is Quicken 2007 for Mac. It has been supplanted by later versions that simply do not meet my needs, which Q2007 does admirably. I have to choose between staying with an ever more obsolete version of the OS and giving up access to my most important data--data going back nearly 30 years. How on earth does that benefit anyone?


MacBook Pro 15", macOS 10.14

Posted on Jun 12, 2019 10:03 AM

Reply
Question marked as Top-ranking reply

Posted on Jun 12, 2019 10:40 AM

You do have another potential solution and that is to consider using a VM manager, like Parallels or VMware. With this manager, you can create a VM (virtual machine) of an earlier version of OS X or macOS that the version of Quicken you have, works with.


Then, whenever you need to run Quicken, you would just start up this VM and use Quicken as you always have. FWIW, I have multiple earlier releases of macOS going back to OS X Lion as VMs. I run these to help answer questions for folks here at the forum.

19 replies

Jul 2, 2019 7:55 PM in response to mdpaustin

As it happens, I now have an answer to my own question. As I attempted to enter some historic data this evening, I got a message saying that the transaction file is full. I was working with investment transactions, so I crossed my fingers and tried entering a transaction into a credit card account. No dice--evidently there is only one comprehensive transaction file for all transactions of all types. It must be pretty generous to let me get 30 years of data into it, but it is not infinitely large. My bet is that with newer versions of Quicken there is either no such limit or a much higher limit. I can get around the problem in any of several tedious ways, but basically I have run into a genuine limitation of the program and not simply a matter of Apple's being arbitrary.

Jun 12, 2019 10:27 AM in response to BobTheFisherman

Bob, thank you for your clarification. I guess what I am trying to ask is whether permitting 32-bit software to run would somehow degrade the performance of the overall system. All of my other software is 64-bit and I'm fine with that; I have no desire to disadvantage myself. And I don't know enough about systems to know whether continuing to permit 32-bit software to run would create problems. If not, though, it seems quite arbitrary on Apple's part. Quicken was a part of Intuit in 2007; that is no longer the case, and neither company has any incentive to upgrade what I continue to feel is the best version they have ever put out--and I have used virtually every version up to Q2007 that has ever existed. I have also used its successors, and they are, from my perspective, functionally inferior to Q2007. Maybe not from a machine operations standpoint, but when it comes to handling my financial and other data in the way that works best for me, they simply are not up to the task. I have installed a virtual version of Mojave under Parallels and it is working for me, but it is a clunky solution that I wish I could avoid. At least there is a solution, though.

This thread has been closed by the system or the community team. You may vote for any posts you find helpful, or search the Community for additional answers.

Forced use of 64-bit applications

Welcome to Apple Support Community
A forum where Apple customers help each other with their products. Get started with your Apple Account.