Hi Chris, thank you for this very full response: I'm reading here in the Community of many aficionados such as yourself who've devoted vast amounts of time to something very close to their heart, and little can be as inspiring as that simple fact. After all, the word "amateur" derives from the Latin "amare" meaning "to love". We spend time on our iTunes collections because we love them. Hence, it seems incomprehensible at best, and callous at worst, that the firm that provided these hobbyists - and professionals, I see - with the inspiration to pursue the iTunes route as the favoured model for music storage, referencing, archiving and (what it's there for, after all) enjoyment should now seemingly - seemingly that is - be turning tail on its own flock of devotees to constrain them and the rest of its - forget not - freely contracting, loyal customers to switch their listening model to one that, pardon my conservative outlook, while opening up a panoply of tastes, styles, discoveries and even epiphanies is not in the end what I personally want, which is to listen to tunes collected and loved by me since youth (my first record was gifted me as a birthday present age 5, and I still own it) and which therefore mean so much to me. I never really "got" Spotify, though its appeal to a younger generation is perhaps understandable. They play it at the gym and I've asked a couple of times what the track was we'd just listened to, and so I know there are discoveries to be made. But how much banal and uninteresting music would I need to plough through to find the few gems that appeal to me? I dunno, but I'm happy the way I am. It literally breaks my heart to read the desperation in some of the reports on this Community, yours included, and the stolid resolve to find a means to keep what we've enjoyed until now just a little longer, or gallant resignation to just be grateful for what we had before and can't expect to continue. The work-arounds are useful, I'm sure, but, might ask, are these ultimately issues for which we should even be needing a work-around? As with everything, that which ends up being dumped as outdated, out of fashion or just too way out - whether it's an Edsel or overtaken technology like video tape - did at one time have its fanfare and flourish at launch, which many will have bought into on the strength of the reputation held by the manufacturer making the launch. While Apple cannot be held liable to continue in perpetuity every last feature of every program it's ever written, no one can, what emerges in this correspondence is that many have invested time, trouble and energy, and no little money, in building collections and adding peripherals, like Sonos (thank you for educating me!) and that must surely, in the consciousnesses of a firm with such a client-centric renown as Apple has, evoke a sense of regret in the board room, at moves that were perhaps rashly decided on based on financial projections instead of the firm remaining cognisant of the existing customer base's "reasonable and justified expectations" (a legal term with currency in Belgium, where I live) that that which was proffered initially would remain in place barring any cogent reason for its discontinuation. For they might then have erred more to making the venture into streaming whilst nonetheless retaining the options available for the home hobbyist/iTunes lover. Who knows? A rethink? Matthew, More's manservant in Robert Bolt's "A Man For All Seasons", perhaps encapsulates it well: "I wish we could all have good luck, all the time. I wish we had wings. I wish rainwater was beer. But it isn't."
My remark regarding Apple's senior advisers was of course meant as a compliment to them. For, just how many hairs do you wrench out of your scalp before you reach for the helpline? I for one am usually at the end of my tether. Yet they will not rest till a problem's solved and they defuse irritation as if by magic. I don't think they harness these advisers inordinately to a script - the potential issues are too varied to cover the whole gamut; no, I think it's people selection that's at work there: simply, Apply is shrewd enough to take on as advisers people who not only have the requisite knowledge but also care about people and take pride in lending the helping hand to getting them back on the road again. With such an attitude, the scripts come by themselves. Maybe a board member will read this and make the obvious link I hereby intend, without my needing to spell it out in ungracious terms. I recall Pamela Stephenson in a sketch from "Not The Nine O'clock News", a comedy chestnut from the BBC when I was a kid. We see her on the American Express phone helpline with a customer. Go search it out online. The punchline is simple and took the UK by storm back in the day.
Warm regards, buona fortuna and bonne chance to all and sundry out there in this Community still wrestling with their problems. Nice to talk to you, Chris.