NJJackinVA wrote:
<sarcasm>
So the solution is just run your Mac with nothing installed, it works just fine.... AKA a very expensive Chromebook.....
</sarcasm>
Fortunately, you know that that is far from the truth.
The point of a truly clean install of Big Sur is not a directive to always run that way, but as a proof that the issues people are running into are the result of incompatible third-party software.
Upgrade the third-party software, and eliminate any that are not upgraded to compatible versions, and your troubles disappear.
If you have third-party software that you depend upon that hasn’t, yet, been upgraded to a compatible version, then you may not wish to continue running this major Operating System (OS) upgrade.
The reality is this battery drain issue was very pronounced when Big Sur came out, and has gotten incrementally better with each dot release. …
Or simply over time, due, for instance, to Automatic third-party software upgrades.
Your argument relies upon purely circumstantial evidence.
There is a good reason why circumstantial evidence is inadmissible in courts of Law: such is usually misleading.
… To say the OS is perfectly fine and it is the fault of 3rd party software developers is disingenuous. …
Such is not at all «disingenuous». In fact, such is demonstrably true, by simply running without the «3rd party software» that is not specifically upgraded for compatibility with this major Operating System (OS) upgrade.
It is only after adding in such not-fully-compatible third-party software, that the issues begin.
Due to the fundamental difference between an OS upgrade, vs. a mere update, it is fundamentally foolhardy to expect old software to be compatible, without specifically checking such compatibility.
… While there may be changes that developers will need to make to their code base, it is a result of changes made to the OS that precipitated this issue.
Of course there were «changes made to the OS»!
That’s the very point of an OS upgrade!
Furthermore, all the «developers» were alerted to that fact, well in advance.
Most of your third-party software is probably already upgraded/updated, if you simply go and check. (Unfortunately, there’s no guarantee they won’t want you to pay for the new versions.)
The Macbook and macOS is an end user product that is marketed to and purchased by consumers of all technical levels. It is reasonable to expect, especially how Apple deploys updates/upgrades, most users will simply upgrade their system, and by extension that Apple should also expect the same. …
This is why I consider the way Apple deviated from their prior practice, and actually provided the major Big Sur upgrade through the Update Panel, to be a “tactical” error.
… IMO because of that Apple has an obligation to fully vet their software to not do harm, and from that point of view they failed with this release. …
I’m not going to touch that, since it is not properly applicable to an OS upgrade, vs. a mere update.
While such is arguably true of updates, such is not so applicable to upgrades.
That’s why I keep stressing the distinction. (I’m not a lawyer, but the distinction would seem to hold legal weight, as well as technical.)
… Furthermore one of the key selling points of products from Apple and why we are willing to pay more for them is their high level of technical abstraction, they deliver products that just work and are easy to use …
Yes.
…, with that comes a responsibility to make sure things like this don't happen.
Such does not absolve users of their need to exercise due diligence. (There are even Latin terms that lawyers tend to use for such consumer responsibilities.)