Servant of Cats wrote:
IdrisSeabright wrote:
D1abolic wrote:
Soooo, is it Apple doesn’t want us sharing IDs with others, or that they don’t want us using them on more than one device?
Apple really does want one person using an Apple ID across all of their devices. It's how things like Continuity work.
Work seamlessly across all your devices - Apple Support
They appear to want (one person, one role) using the same Apple ID across all of their devices.
If you are doing things both for an employer, and for yourself, then using the same Apple ID for both means that you are potentially sharing everything between both roles.
Not potentially sharing. That’s actually sharing everything.
And an employer that requires that—and that degree of data and device control can be a reasonable requirement for specific situations—means the employer effectively owns that iPhone, if not actually owns that iPhone.
Mixing personal and employer data isn’t a great strategy for an employee either, same as mixing together the data of multiple people.
Pragmatically, if somebody really wants to control a device and wants to control what a user of a device can do, then provision the device. Sorta-kinda splitting up the data doesn’t work, as this twenty-seven-page effort to try to do that should make clear.
Best case here, Apple provides tools to partition and migrate shared data into separate Apple IDs, and to better design or better document the existing calendar and contacts sharing. Marginal case (for some of the folks here in the twenty-seven page thread) is a switch to isolate some of the sharing. Isolation which likely then all starts to look like the mess that is Focus and Screen Time and Parental Controls, but, well, worse, because the architected means to separate this data is the Apple ID. Whether that separation is role-based (work and home) or is separation for multiple people.