music_is_her_name wrote:
......I know Apple take their software seriously but as they move into a place on the home entertainment 'critical path' (yes there is some irony in that...) Apple development needs to balance stability and reliability versus 'nice to haves': e.g., who cares how many streams exist in a particular genre?
Reliability and stability are key.
But, there is something which is even MORE important than that. And that is both the willingness and the ability to rapidly analyze and respond to problem areas such as this which typically arise from time to time.
This is crucial if one wants to play with the big boys in an industry such as this. Because nobody is going to want to build or purchase gear based on Apple technology if problems such as these aren't going to be dealt with swiftly. Why? Because the REAL players eat this sort of thing for lunch. There is no space or place in this field for dilettantes.
One can be laissez-faire about such things when we are pumping out iPods for the kids, but when you want to try to foist that same technology into a serious and growing industry such as High-End Audio and Home Entertainment...then it's time to spit out the bubble gum and behave as though you deserve to be there.
In this case, as is being demonstrated by the (almost lack of a) response we are receiving, Apple is giving the appearance of either apathy....or incompetence. This engenders neither reliability nor stability. It screams a lack of the former and implies the absence of the latter.
I am also an Apple shareholder. Have been since the IPO. I find it quite troubling that Apple would code both iTunes and Remote in such a way as they have. Even the local village idiot could have looked at this arrangement and predicted we would wind up where we are today.
To say all of this is inexcuseable is being diplomatic at best. Personally.....I can think of more accurate adjectives.
....sT