StoneMirror wrote:
Okay, without getting into the wisdom of using a brand-spanking-new app when you've got $32,000 on the line, or double-checking a location (which I'd do routinely under circumstances like that) or how it can take half an hour to go seven blocks in New York City, I've gotten very curious about what the address that Apple misplaced was. I've been using the new Maps app around Santa Cruz, and haven't run into any real vagaries myself.
New York is one of the easiest places there is to turn an address into a location; people have been doing it since before there were personal computers, so I'm finding this a little surprising...
"Apple purposely made their product worse just because they don't want to work with a company that has a blatantly superior product."
More like "Apple purposely decided that they didn't want to work with a company which had used the presence of its CEO on Apple's board to rip them off."
"Apple, by their own admission, is all about delivering the best user experience possible, but this time they didn't deliver
I don't believe that this extends to providing additional income for a company that Apple feels ripped them off.
There was a lack of wisdom on my part for sure, I will admit that. But like I said before, I thought originally that the new Maps app was simply a new UI on top of the existing Google Maps database. Had I known differently, I would haven't have trusted it. Normally (even before iOS 6) I verify the address before I even leave my house for the city, but in this case the meeting wasn't a pre-planned event.
As for the address, it wasn't an address, it was the name of a cafe that I had only been to once before several years ago (which, by the way, I originally found on my iPhone 3G using the Maps app). Unfortunately, the person I was meeting was a client from Los Angeles that is unfamilier with New York City. Normally when I meet with someone that is familier with the city, they give me a cross-street, which anyone who has spent any amount of time in the city can find with relative ease.
Obviously us underlings will probably never truly find out why Apple broke ties with Google. But it probably revolved around money and the competition from Android. Which is perfectly okay with me, I honestly could care less whether Apple works with Google or not. My point is simply that Apple touts the user experience in all of its products, but in this case they fell short.
I actually am reinstalling iOS 6 as we speak, now that I know I can use the web browser to navigate using Google Maps. Still haven't decided if I will re-order an iPhone 5 though. But anyway, when all is said and done, I still enjoy Apple products and I am by no means angry at Apple for doing what they did (granted, I was pretty angry the day it happened). It is their money, their product, and they can do whatever they want. I just really don't understand why they would purposly release a product with an App that is blatantly worse than what was previously available.