Sorry, but the functional aspect is all that holds water, technically. Purely cosmetic issues are not covered under warranty. And there's nothing in consumer law that requires a company to rectify a purely cosmetic issue. Earlier there have been mentions of a car's paint job? That's not purely cosmetic. The primary purpose of a car's paint is to protect the underlying metal from oxidation. Therefore, a defective paint job can definitely lead to physical, technical, performance and even safety issues.
Now, if Apple agrees that the defect is likely to eventually cause a technical problem in the future, that's different. Which is why it comes back to what I originally said : Talk to Apple about it.
What has Apple told you when you've reported this to them?
And Apple isn't afraid of lawsuits. That's not why they are addressing the issue. They are addressing the issue because they've chosen to go above and beyond regarding the cosmetic issue that might impact performance. Technically, by the letter of the law & warranty terms, they can choose to wait until the cosmetic issue becomes a performance issue. But they're choosing not to wait. Good on them. So, exactly what is your issue?
You don't like my opinion on the matter? Tough.
Wow, you are so clearly enamored with Apple it's not even funny. Going above and beyond would be admitting the problem publicly and offering to repair or replace, something they are not required to do by law until ordered to do so and which would tarnish their image. And if you're going to start citing consumer law, show me a precedent whereby cosmetic issues are not covered under consumer law. I bet you can't. Actually, I KNOW you cant because no such precedent exists.
And I'm not talking about Apple's response to the issue. Their response in my opinion has so far been appropriate. I wouldn't expect them to go above and beyond on an issue like this, in fact, it would be stupid to do so unless they are simply after brownie points. What I'm talking about is you and how you are a troll on this board completely downplaying what is a real issue due to what is likely some serious underlying character issue. I hope you can understand that.