10.13.4 Displaylink no longer working

After upgrading to 10.13.4 my display link monitors no longer function. I've tried updating the displaylink drivers but this does not return the functionality to display multiple monitors that existed in 10.13.3. As a consequence I had to roll back to 10.13.3 to get my monitors to function again. This rollback also confirms that the issue appears to be in 10.13.4. I've got a very large number of MACs that I can not permit this upgrade to be deployed to in my enterprise as it will cause enormous support issues. Does some one have a fix as to how to get this minor bug fix update to function with displaylink?

MacBook Pro TouchBar and Touch ID, macOS High Sierra (10.13.3)

Posted on Mar 30, 2018 2:54 PM

Reply
Question marked as Top-ranking reply

Posted on Mar 30, 2018 5:09 PM

I have never used any DisplayLink equipment, but I read this thread after previously seeing complaints on other web sites and forums about DisplayLink breaking in 10.13.4. I just did a Google search and DisplayLink has a statement and beta drivers on their web site. They caution that their beta drivers are not a complete solution. Here is the link:


http://www.displaylink.com/downloads/macos

Important Information about macOS 10.13.4 update


We have become aware that installing macOS release Version 10.13.4 will cause DisplayLink connected displays to go blank after the OS upgrade, with the current DisplayLink driver [4.1] installed. Functionality such as Ethernet and audio, where implemented, is unaffected. We have alerted Apple to this issue and are working hard to find a resolution. These features continue to work as expected in 10.13.3.


In the meantime, we have a new driver [4.3] that will enable clone mode, but not mirror or extended mode displays in 10.13.4. If you require mirror or extended mode displays, we recommend that you stay on macOS 10.13.3 or earlier at this time.

Some are wondering if DisplayLink got broken as a result of the major video re-coding that Apple did to roll out final support for eGPUs in 10.13.4.

139 replies

Mar 30, 2018 4:43 PM in response to John Galt

Display link is a set of drivers that enable docks to support display, ethernet and other USB ports.


https://displaylink.org/


These docks are sold by many major vendors such as Dell, Asus, HP, Fujitsu, Lenovo, Startech etc


http://www.displaylink.com/products/universal-docking-stations


While these all worked and functioned on 10.13.3 once upgraded to 10.13.4 they will no longer provide display extension capabilities. All these devices that used to function with a MAC no longer do so. This further segments MACs to home users only and further reduces any ability to use them in corporate environments.

Mar 30, 2018 11:17 PM in response to BradSP

I am in the same boat. At my company we were using the plugable usbc triple display dock. It worked perfectly with no issues. Wakes from sleep, from closed clamshell etc. We are a smaller company so spending 300 dollars per dock on something like owc usbc dock is expensive for us since we have to get a lot of them. The 300 dollar docks like owc are awesome products but when a dock does the same thing for 150 at half the cost It’s a huge savings. If it doesn’t work well for some products then people can simply not buy them but why make such a huge change on an update rather than in a new OS X upgrade. In an enterprise environment we first dealt with dongles and adapters and now when we found a product that worked for us we have to replace them now. Apple is making it increasingly difficult to integrate their products into a mixed environment. It seems that the company no longer cares what consumers would like to have but just kind of pull these weird moves like the 10.13.4 update. It’s different just using a Mac for yourself at home versus dealing with these issues on an enterprise level.

Apr 2, 2018 6:48 PM in response to BradSP

There are a few things we can do. One is run one display off your dual link adapter and connect another display directly from some of the free ports. The plugable dock I use also charges the Mac so there’s one free port (I have the non touchbar Mac) or you can get a dock that will work but it’s pretty pricey. This dock will work for sure:


https://eshop.macsales.com/item/OWC/TB3DK13PSG/


The above dock requires no drivers and will also charge your Mac. There are others like this one from elgato and Belkin, but they are all at the 300 price point.

Apr 6, 2018 5:22 PM in response to addse23

DisplayLink just updated their beta driver to try and fix some issues with the cloning of desktop. Unfortunately they also posted that below which sounds like these docks will never work as they once did, and that the solution may be a long time away. Sounds like these docks are now end of life for any Mac users wanting an extended display solution.


"Our teams are investigating several potential workarounds that could enable some level of extended desktop functionality to be restored in 10.13.4. In parallel, we are continuing to explore with Apple routes to a permanent and complete solution."

Apr 17, 2018 1:29 PM in response to BradSP

I tried everything I could think of, and I have concluded that Apple knew what they were doing, but didnt care about all the users who relied on the ability to add a third monitor (or more) to their macs. In addition, there will be NO fix to it by apple. Its been known for months now by display link, and nothing is forthcoming. In addition, Apple didnt warn people that thei would happen, as they SHOULD have. Steps to take: 1) Roll back to 10.13.3, and 2) NEVER trust an update from apple again until many moons have passed and all these little tricks have been exposed. I must have spend 10 hours on this problem, and needless to say, I am quite upset that I wasnt warned by apple. It was my fault in that I never should have upgraded and I trusted Apple would never do something like this.

Apr 18, 2018 9:37 AM in response to cjpsych80

i used an HDMI to display port (mac) adapter. you can find several options on Amazon. that said, it should also work for VGA to display port (mac) or DVI to display port (mac). for me, i searched under HDMI to thunderbolt 2 realized that thunderbolt ports double as display ports and found the cheapest one (actually went to Fry's for it). i think the cheapest on amazon was like... $12.

Mar 31, 2018 11:21 AM in response to Danikm30

I read this morning that duet display are dead as well. And I see a few major international corporate are also logging issues with apple. Guess everyone is unhappy that Apple seem t think that they don;t need to be in the enterprise environment. After 3 months of working on this Display link have not got a solution. So it appears that this will have killed off alot of MAC uses in enterprises. If this persists it will be interesting to see if Macs survive for anything other than home use.

Apr 3, 2018 1:28 AM in response to Danikm30

yeah $300USD works to be about $470 here and for 1000 odd Macs thats expensive. There are other reports that even these docks for TB1/2 no longer work??


From display link forum.


It seems Apple is pushing aggressively Thunderbolt 3 as the only option for any accessories. But that reminds me of the sad story with Thunderbolt 1 and 2. The docks were expensive, hard to get, and with the 10.13.4 update eGPU solutions were rendered obsolete. User uploaded file


If you ran an eGPU from your TB1/2 port you ended up with a blank screen as well last Friday.

Apr 11, 2018 1:25 PM in response to BradSP

There's a reason a proper dock costs big $$$. DisplayLink is simply pushing data over USB, software does all the work. You don't get any acceleration and you can't display HDCP protected content, it's only because of relatively beefy hardware that it works.
Now that "driver" stopped working, that happened with first beta of 10.13.4, quite a while ago.

DisplayLink wasn't able to produce a working driver.

And it's Apple's fault... how?


I have a shelf full of unsuported hardware - USB colorimeter with drivers for Win98, a Blackberry cradle that fails to work over USB 2.0 because it used some undocumented glitches that stopped working in recent chipsets, Soundcards that stopped working with WinXP, TV Tuner that apparently only properly worked on one version of Vista... Should I blame Microsoft for not making the drivers? Should I blame Intel for not making their chipsets as quirky as the old ones?


Just because lots of people were tricked into buying junk doesn't mean Apple should go out of its way to support it.

Apr 18, 2018 8:18 AM in response to ThisIsPreposterous

ThisIsPreposterous wrote:


The point is that it was a simple utility that worked flawlessly and was withdrawn without warning.

There was two months of warning. Unfortunately, it appears that the 3rd party developers had used some "creative" techniques to implement their solutions and they were unable or unwilling to make the necessary changes before 10.13.4 was released.

Apr 18, 2018 9:38 AM in response to ThisIsPreposterous

ThisIsPreposterous wrote:


? Do you have some kind of citation for this? I received no warning that this functionality would be removed in 10.13.4

macOS 10.13.4 was first released to developers on Jan. 24th: https://9to5mac.com/2018/01/24/macos-10-13-4-beta-1/

There was a post on the DisplayLink forums about problems with 10.13.4 2 days later: https://www.displaylink.org/forum/showthread.php?t=65890


NDA restrictions would have prevented the developers from warning customers until the build was publicly released.


The creative ways developers implement their solutions does not mean that they were doing anything wrong. Exploiting options and coming up with creative workarounds is a developer's job. Additionally, using an iPad or other device as an external monitor should be functionality Apple encourages. Many businesses depend on being able to do this.

That is correct.


I don't know the specific details of how this external display was implemented. Nor do I know any details of what 3rd party developers are doing to remedy the situation.


I do know that Apple make major changes to the operating system at least twice a year. Those changes always break something. Any 3rd party developer should know that too and should have a realistic assessment of how susceptible their product might be to these changes. I don't think that Apple should be making these kinds of changes, especially on minor point releases.


But who is at fault? The 3rd party developer, for ignoring Apple's history and marketing/releasing a product that any reasonable developer would assume to be at risk of failure due to update? Apple, for making these kinds of major updates with only 2 months of warning? Or users, for ignoring both Apple's history and that of 3rd party developers and blindly clicking through on any notification that appears in the upper right corner? All users should have Time Machine backups too. They might also have APFS snapshots that would allow a restore in 2 minutes instead of 2 hours.


As long as users keep applying updates the day they are released, they keep giving Apple more power over 3rd party developers. Every year, users lose a little bit of power and functionality due to this dynamic. Yet every year, they keep clicking that update button. This year, you lost your DisplayLink drivers. In a few months, you will likely lose a ton of legacy 32-bit apps. Keep clicking that update button!

This thread has been closed by the system or the community team. You may vote for any posts you find helpful, or search the Community for additional answers.

10.13.4 Displaylink no longer working

Welcome to Apple Support Community
A forum where Apple customers help each other with their products. Get started with your Apple Account.