Site Blocked warning from neuster won't let me open a particular site. How can I get the protection removed?

There’s add-on anti-virus or anti-malware app(s) installed here, or there’s an add-on nanny-filter configuration, either installed locally or running from your ISP via the ISP DNS server, or there’s a browser extension playing games with your network traffic. Please post the Etrecheck.

Set it to Using DHCP, not Manual unless you use an IP in the 192.168.2.x range.

DNS is entered in...

Sys Prefs>Network Pref Pane, highlight Interface>Advanced button>DNS tab>little + icon.


 Try putting these numbers in...

8.8.8.8

8.8.4.4

Apply.

You could try the tor browser. Should get past server web address filtering. Note: a lot of people use it to get around state sponsored filtering. Criminal type try to use it got escape the notice of the police. There is some evidence that this doesn't work.

https://www.torproject.org/download/

R

Yes change your DNS to those or the ones I mentioned, you have other DNS Advantage DNS numbers in use.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neustar#DNS_Advantage

Sounds safe, but can't tell why they actually are blocking it in the 1st place.

It has a global traffic rank of #7,562,349 in the world. It is a domain having .club extension. This website is estimated worth of $ 240.00 and have a daily income of around $ 1.00. welovetotravel.club is SUSPICIOUS and may contains potentially risky contents. You should be careful while visiting this website and make sure you have best Antivirus Software installed.

Updated 15 seconds ago.

https://welovetotravel.club.cutestat.com/

You didn't create a DNS, you created a new Location, which you can delete, then change the DNS settings in another Location.

Or edit this one to use DHCP instead of Manually, then add the DNS numbers for that Location...

Are you using...

https://welovetotravel.club

Do you have any Anti-virus Apps installed?

Are you certain they are legit?

What are you up to, here?

That’s an unusual network configuration.

You’re at a public (likely also static) IP address, but with a private router address.

No subnet mask, either. That’ll hopefully get you a CIDR of /32; one host.

I’d expect the router to have the public static IP address, if one has been acquired for this use. Not a host “behind” the router. if the host is not directly connected to a bridged-mode modem/bridge box and fully exposed to the Internet, I’d expect to see the host at a private IP address, with a router in the same private subnet. The private IP address from either a static allocation established for this network, or acquired from the DHCP server most networks now have.

Barbara Selby wrote:

Should I just delete the DNS I created since I obviously didn't know what I was doing?

Far more than DNS is wrong, based on that configuration image. I wouldn’t expect what was shown to work.

If the network box here—the router/firewall/NAT/gateway box—is set up correctly, then set this computer to acquire its own address using DHCP automatic setting and not manual/static/fixed configuration shown in the image, and then see what you get for an IP address and a DHCP server address.

A local class or discussion or workshop or one-on-one help on IP networking might help with the understanding of how these pieces fit together, too. That’s not the easiest to communicate through a series of forum postings.